Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

std::net_tcp: handle ipv6 addresses #2656

Closed
graydon opened this issue Jun 20, 2012 · 5 comments
Closed

std::net_tcp: handle ipv6 addresses #2656

graydon opened this issue Jun 20, 2012 · 5 comments
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor

graydon commented Jun 20, 2012

As per fixme, not presently supported.
@olsonjeffery
Copy link
Contributor

this one is mine.. im working on it in olsonjeffery/rust tcp_cleanup

only noticed because of the merge conflict :)

trying to land a pull request in the next few days. sorry for the silence.

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor Author

graydon commented Jun 22, 2012

no worries. thanks for the ongoing effort!

@olsonjeffery olsonjeffery mentioned this issue Jun 29, 2012
Closed
brson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2012
@olsonjeffery @brson
std: addressing #2656 (ipv6 support in net::tcp)
9edcb10 
.. there are some additional FIXME nags in net_tcp (L 1012) about blocking
because libuv is holding unsafe ptrs to task local data. the proposed
fix going is not really feasible w/ the current design, IMO, but i'll
leave it there in case someone really wants to make the case without
creating more hassle than it's worth.
@bblum
Copy link
Contributor

bblum commented Jun 10, 2013

libextra::timer and libextra::net_tcp are deprecated pending #6435.

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

visiting for triage. can we close this since the old scheduler is gone?

@anasazi
Copy link
Contributor

anasazi commented Aug 26, 2013

Yes, IPv6 support for TCP and UDP was part of the new runtime.

@anasazi anasazi closed this as completed Aug 26, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@olsonjeffery @graydon @metajack @anasazi @bblum