-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Book: enum comment about match needs more detail #22035
Comments
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2015
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2015
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2015
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 15, 2015
Fixes rust-lang#22035. (mostly by making it irrelevant)
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this issue
Feb 15, 2015
Fixes rust-lang#22035. (mostly by making it irrelevant)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In
enum
, it was just shown howenum
doesn't have equality ops by default among other ops. This should state a (brief) reason whymatch
is useful for many comparison cases (not just that it has pretty branching). I apparently forgot or erased it or something before pushing...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: