Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Guide: awkward wording "the range function is a function" provided by Rust #17230

Closed
bjpop opened this issue Sep 13, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Comments

@bjpop
Copy link

bjpop commented Sep 13, 2014

Section 11.1, for loops says "In our example, the range function is a function, provided by Rust, "

The repetition of the word "function" is awkward.

The "provided by Rust" is redundant.

I suggest re-wording to: "The range function takes a start and end position, and returns an iterator over those values."

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants