Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking Issue for const_array_as_mut_slice #133333

Open
1 of 3 tasks
bjoernager opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Tracking Issue for const_array_as_mut_slice #133333

bjoernager opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@bjoernager
Copy link
Contributor

bjoernager commented Nov 22, 2024

Add the const specifier to <[T; N]>::as_mut_slice.

Public API

impl<T, const N: usize> {
    pub const fn as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &mut [T];
}

Steps / History

Unresolved Questions

  • None yet.
@bjoernager bjoernager added C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 22, 2024
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Nov 22, 2024

I've r+'ed the unstable implementation. Given that this is as trivial as it gets, I think it makes sense for this to be stabilized without any further consideration. cc @rust-lang/libs-api for possible FCP

@bjoernager
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll get around to the stabilisation PR, then. :)

@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Nov 22, 2024

Up to you, as a stabilization PR is of course simple. I would be surprised if the team didn't want to stabilize it, but it's also not up to me.

@bjoernager
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure. If anything, it can just sit idle until the (I'm assuming inevitable) FCP has passed – or whatever else happens.

compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
…e, r=jhpratt

Mark `<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` with the `const` specifier.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#133333

`<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` can have the `const` specifier without any changes to the function body.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
…e, r=jhpratt

Mark `<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` with the `const` specifier.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#133333

`<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` can have the `const` specifier without any changes to the function body.
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
…e, r=jhpratt

Mark `<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` with the `const` specifier.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#133333

`<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` can have the `const` specifier without any changes to the function body.
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133332 - bjoernager:const-array-as-mut-slice, r=jhpratt

Mark `<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` with the `const` specifier.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#133333

`<[T; N]>::as_mut_slice` can have the `const` specifier without any changes to the function body.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants