Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc treats ignored doc tests incorrectly #12939

Closed
brson opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13272
Closed

rustdoc treats ignored doc tests incorrectly #12939

brson opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13272
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 16, 2014

When I ignore my only doc test the output I get from the test run is

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured

Indicating there are no tests, but there should be 1 ignored test.

@ipetkov
Copy link
Contributor

ipetkov commented Mar 31, 2014

I'll take a shot at fixing this over the next few days

@bors bors closed this as completed in e5f1b9f Apr 4, 2014
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2022
…ace, r=Veykril

Error Diagnostics appear in the wrong place

Fix rust-lang#12436
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2024
…=xFrednet

Merge lintcheck popular-crates bin as a subcommand

Also rewrites it to use `ureq` to drop some heavy dependencies as `crates_io_api` brings in `reqwest`

r? `@xFrednet`

changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants