Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix nested includes resolving from the wrong base file #16348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Jan 11, 2024

Fixes #16109

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 11, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Jan 11, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 11, 2024

📌 Commit 215ede8 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 215ede8 with merge 9d8889c...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 9d8889c to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9d8889c into rust-lang:master Jan 11, 2024
10 checks passed
@Veykril Veykril deleted the nested-includes branch September 9, 2024 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v0.3.1766 breaks intellisense & "go to definition" for generated tonic types
3 participants