This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
Propose more relaxtions to closure catpures #16
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Conceptually this is a result of capturing based on the use of variables from the enclosing environment of the closure instead of based on variables that appear within the closure.
Breif details about implementation:
closure_captures
,upvars_capture_map
andClosureSubsts
usingupvars_mentioned
we will rely on expressions/ Places being used within the closure. This will be handled as part of Use hir::Place in closure_captures #7 Always make the "upvar types" a tuple of the actual upvar types (Parent issue#53488) #4upvars_mentioned
in typechk we will accept such code in typechk while setting a no-capture obligation that will be validated in trait selection post capture analysis.Rendered
cc: @rust-lang/wg-rfc-2229