Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default values for
readme
if not specified #8277Default values for
readme
if not specified #8277Changes from 12 commits
b23390b
3f46046
f42863c
ffe5fbb
0dfdba6
d1fe89e
dcae5fc
54b0432
37836e6
623c2d5
05cfcb6
4d8e1ea
77c52c2
b0a3cc6
58ee013
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an interesting case because
readme = true
could actually still infer no actual README if the files are missing. Perhaps for now we could just makereadme = true
an error? Otherwise we probably want to assert that the default readme is indeed present, andNone
isn't returned in this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.
What do you think of this approach: Similar to how the
build
field is handled, ifreadme = true
, we assume a default value ofREADME.md
(instead of possiblyNone
, as you pointed out). Then, we can validate that the file really exists while creating theManifestMetadata
, andbail!
if the file doesn't exist. This would be more consistent with the behavior of thebuild
field, but I'm not sure how important that is.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that sounds reasonable to me!