-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: mirgate fix* and future_incompat_report to snapbox #14173
Conversation
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
.with_status(101) | ||
.run(); | ||
p.cargo("fix").cwd("src").run(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[allow(deprecated)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with_stderr_does_not_contain
is being used in this function.
.run(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[allow(deprecated)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with_stderr_does_not_contain
is being used in this function.
.run(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[allow(deprecated)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with_stderr_does_not_contain
is being used in this function.
.run(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[allow(deprecated)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with_stderr_does_not_contain
is being used in this function
@@ -262,6 +314,7 @@ fn test_multi_crate() { | |||
assert_eq!(lines.next(), None); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#[allow(deprecated)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with_stdout_does_not_contain
is being used in this function.
tests/testsuite/fix.rs
Outdated
p.cargo("fix --edition --allow-no-vcs") | ||
.with_stderr_contains("[CHECKING] foo [..]") | ||
.with_stderr_contains(&format!( | ||
"\ | ||
[WARNING] `src/lib.rs` is already on the latest edition ({latest_stable}), unable to migrate further | ||
", | ||
latest_stable = latest_stable | ||
)) | ||
.with_stderr_data(str![]) | ||
.run(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why this isn't being overwritten. Is this fix even running?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. I think we can add deprecated and leave off for now.
Lines 881 to 885 in c7cb45c
edition = '{}' | |
"#, | |
latest_stable | |
), | |
) |
tests/testsuite/fix.rs
Outdated
.with_stderr_data(str![[r#" | ||
... | ||
[FIXED] src/lib.rs ([..] fixes) | ||
... | ||
"#]]) | ||
.with_stderr_data( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you need two separate assertions?
Also mind the plurality. Maybe ([..] fix[..])
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I forgot to mention this! It sometimes generate two entries:
1 1 | [COMPILING] foo v0.0.1 ([ROOT]/foo)
2 2 | [FIXED] build.rs (1 fix)
3 3 | [FIXED] src/main.rs (1 fix)
4 4 | [FIXED] examples/foo.rs (1 fix)
5 5 | [FIXED] tests/a.rs (1 fix)
6 6 | [FIXED] src/lib.rs ([..]fix[..])
7 7 | [FINISHED] `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in [ELAPSED]s
8 + [FIXED] src/lib.rs (1 fix)
Do you prefer something looks more like this?
.with_stderr_data(
str![[r#"
[COMPILING] foo v0.0.1 ([ROOT]/foo)
[FIXED] build.rs (1 fix)
[FIXED] src/lib.rs ([..]fix[..])
[FIXED] src/main.rs (1 fix)
[FIXED] examples/foo.rs (1 fix)
[FIXED] tests/a.rs (1 fix)
[FINISHED] `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in [ELAPSED]s
...
"#]]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Based on the comment, I think that matches the behavior of the old assertion and is still valid today.
tests/testsuite/fix.rs
Outdated
p.cargo("fix --edition --allow-no-vcs") | ||
.with_stderr_contains("[CHECKING] foo [..]") | ||
.with_stderr_contains(&format!( | ||
"\ | ||
[WARNING] `src/lib.rs` is already on the latest edition ({latest_stable}), unable to migrate further | ||
", | ||
latest_stable = latest_stable | ||
)) | ||
.with_stderr_data(str![]) | ||
.run(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. I think we can add deprecated and leave off for now.
Lines 881 to 885 in c7cb45c
edition = '{}' | |
"#, | |
latest_stable | |
), | |
) |
Feedbacks addressed! Thanks for the review! |
Thanks! @bors r+ |
test: mirgate fix* and future_incompat_report to snapbox ### What does this PR try to resolve? Part of #14039. Migrate following to snapbox: - `tests/testsuite/fix.rs` - `tests/testsuite/fix_n_times.rs` - `tests/testsuite/future_incompat_report.rs`
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This is a new one.
Let us retry @bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Update cargo 23 commits in 4ed7bee47f7dd4416b36fada1909e9a62c546246..a515d463427b3912ec0365d106791f88c1c14e1b 2024-06-25 16:28:22 +0000 to 2024-07-02 20:53:36 +0000 - test: migrate rust_version and rustc* to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14177) - test: mirgate fix* and future_incompat_report to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14173) - test:migrate `edition/error` to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14175) - chore(deps): update compatible (rust-lang/cargo#14174) - refactor(source): Clean up after PathSource/RecursivePathSource split (rust-lang/cargo#14169) - test: Migrate some files to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14132) - test: fix several assertions (rust-lang/cargo#14167) - test: replace glob with explicit unordered calls (rust-lang/cargo#14166) - Make it clear that `CARGO_CFG_TARGET_FAMILY` is multi-valued (rust-lang/cargo#14165) - Document `CARGO_CFG_TARGET_ABI` (rust-lang/cargo#14164) - test: Migrate git to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14159) - test: migrate some files to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14158) - test: migrate registry and registry_auth to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14149) - gix: remove `revision` feature from cargo (rust-lang/cargo#14160) - test: migrate package* and publish* to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14130) - More `update --breaking` tests (rust-lang/cargo#14049) - test: migrate clean to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14096) - Allow `unexpected_builtin_cfgs` lint in `user_specific_cfgs` test (rust-lang/cargo#14153) - test: migrate search, source_replacement and standard_lib to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14151) - Docs: Update config summary to include missing keys. (rust-lang/cargo#14145) - test: migrate `dep_info/diagnostics/direct_minimal_versions` to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14143) - Docs: Remove duplicate `strip` section. (rust-lang/cargo#14146) - Docs: Fix curly quotes in config docs. (rust-lang/cargo#14144)
What does this PR try to resolve?
Part of #14039.
Migrate following to snapbox:
tests/testsuite/fix.rs
tests/testsuite/fix_n_times.rs
tests/testsuite/future_incompat_report.rs