test(lints): Ensure unused optional dep fires for shadowed dep #14028
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a way to have an unused optional dependency before 2024 edition. In prior editions, it is currently a hard error. I'm tempted to switch that hard error to this lint in prior editions but at minimum, we need to make sure we don't make changes that cause this to revert back to a hard error on 2024+
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
test(lints): Ensure unused optional dep fires for shadowed dep This is a way to have an unused optional dependency before 2024 edition. In prior editions, it is currently a hard error. I'm tempted to switch that hard error to this lint in prior editions but at minimum, we need to make sure we don't make changes that cause this to revert back to a hard error on 2024+
|
💥 Test timed out |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2024
Update cargo 8 commits in 34a6a87d8a2330d8c9d578f927489689328a652d..b1feb75d062444e2cee8b3d2aaa95309d65e9ccd 2024-06-04 15:31:01 +0000 to 2024-06-07 20:16:17 +0000 - Keep lints updated (rust-lang/cargo#14030) - test(lints): Ensure unused optional dep fires for shadowed dep (rust-lang/cargo#14028) - Add `cargo update --breaking` (rust-lang/cargo#13979) - Add tooling to document lints (rust-lang/cargo#14025) - Rename --out-dir to --artifact-dir (rust-lang/cargo#13809) - fix(lints): Add unknown_lints to lints list (rust-lang/cargo#14024) - docs(contrib): Suggest atomic commits with separate test commits (rust-lang/cargo#14014) - test(semver): track the behavior of `--precise <prerelease>` (rust-lang/cargo#14013) r? ghost
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust-clippy
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2024
Update cargo 8 commits in 34a6a87d8a2330d8c9d578f927489689328a652d..b1feb75d062444e2cee8b3d2aaa95309d65e9ccd 2024-06-04 15:31:01 +0000 to 2024-06-07 20:16:17 +0000 - Keep lints updated (rust-lang/cargo#14030) - test(lints): Ensure unused optional dep fires for shadowed dep (rust-lang/cargo#14028) - Add `cargo update --breaking` (rust-lang/cargo#13979) - Add tooling to document lints (rust-lang/cargo#14025) - Rename --out-dir to --artifact-dir (rust-lang/cargo#13809) - fix(lints): Add unknown_lints to lints list (rust-lang/cargo#14024) - docs(contrib): Suggest atomic commits with separate test commits (rust-lang/cargo#14014) - test(semver): track the behavior of `--precise <prerelease>` (rust-lang/cargo#14013) r? ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a way to have an unused optional dependency before 2024 edition.
In prior editions, it is currently a hard error.
I'm tempted to switch that hard error to this lint in prior editions but at minimum, we need to make sure we don't make changes that cause this to revert back to a hard error on 2024+