Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Remove extra "in" from cargo-test.md #10971

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

andrewpollack
Copy link
Member

Removes an extra "in" from doc src/doc/src/commands/cargo-test.md

@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @ehuss (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 11, 2022
Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrewpollack thanks!

Could you do me a favor squashing commits?

joshtriplett and others added 2 commits August 11, 2022 16:42
This reverts commit 8345cf5. Since that
time, there are now multiple calls to get the number of CPUs, to handle
the `-j -NUM` case, so factor out a helper function.
@andrewpollack
Copy link
Member Author

@weihanglo I ended up messing up the squash so bad it was easier to bring up a new PR 😅 😹

Apologies for any confusion -- new PR found at #10978

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2022
…nglo

[docs] Remove extra "in" from `cargo-test.md`

Removes an extra "in" from doc src/doc/src/commands/cargo-test.md

Successor to #10971 without bungled merge
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants