Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Absence Operator #395

Closed
znz opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #833
Closed

Absence Operator #395

znz opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by #833

Comments

@znz
Copy link
Member

znz commented Mar 22, 2017

Ruby 2.4.1 で k-takata/Onigmo#82 の Absent Operator が入りました。
(2.4.0 と 2.4.1 の NEWS の差分参照)

@znz znz added the Ruby2.4.0 label Mar 22, 2017
@znz
Copy link
Member Author

znz commented Mar 22, 2017

teeny で分岐はしないというポリシーだったはずなので、#@since 2.4.0 になるんでしょうか。

@okkez
Copy link
Member

okkez commented Mar 23, 2017

あー、辛いですね。。。
分岐としては #@since 2.4.0 にして地の文で「Absent Operator は2.4.1から使えます」って書くのがいいと思います。

@znz
Copy link
Member Author

znz commented May 25, 2017

k-takata/Onigmo#87 で absent operator から absence operator に呼び方が変わっています。

@okkez okkez changed the title Absent Operator Absence Operator Sep 26, 2017
znz added a commit to znz/doctree that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants