-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: document approve_policies command in comment_parser #1886
Conversation
if it's not too much of a stretch you might want to add the word to the footer of the comment when there are failures. Saves reviewers time looking it up |
Thanks for doing this! Looks like there's some tests failing though! If you could fix those we can get this in. |
The `approve_policies` command was added with policy checking but was never included in the command parser help. Also update the comments in the file to reflect all of the commands.
Excellent idea – I have updated that text to include the specific command. |
cbe44ce
to
c54e1f7
Compare
Include the specific command `approve_policies` in the message.
Now passing all tests for both modified help message and policy check failure error. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
…s#1886) * docs: document approve_policies command in help The `approve_policies` command was added with policy checking but was never included in the command parser help. Also update the comments in the file to reflect all of the commands. * feat: Better message on policy failure Include the specific command `approve_policies` in the message.
The
approve_policies
command was added with policy checking but wasnever included in the command parser help.
Add an explicit mention of the
approve_policies
command in the errormessage on policy checking failure.
Also update the comments in the file to reflect all of the commands.