Fix prospector dependencies #4149
Conversation
|
There are new rules that we need to fix |
stsewd
force-pushed
the
fix-prospector-deps
branch
from
f56ef2c to
79dfee4
Compare
requirements/lint.txt
Outdated
| pylint-django | ||
| pylint-celery | ||
| prospector |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think we should pin some of these? At least to major versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think yes, but we'll need to pin minor versions. prospector breaking change was from 0.12.8 -> 0.12.9 :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yea, our linting seems to break on a regular basis. Is there an argument for not just pinning them to a specific release? I don't feel like linting is something we need new features from very often.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The only downside I see if that we'll need to update them manually. Should I pin them in this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yea -- I think "pin them and update them manually and confirm they don't break" is better than "randomly breaks and we have a bunch of failing PR's where we rush to fix it"
| prospector | ||
| pylint-django | ||
| pyflakes | ||
| maxcdn==0.0.7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thi dependency is also on deploy.txt, and if it's deleted all tests pass, not sure if we really need this here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yea, we aren't supporting maxcdn anymore, but we might have tests for it. This is related to #2091
| maxcdn | ||
| # astroid 1.6.2 breaks pylint-django | ||
| # https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint-django/issues/117 | ||
| astroid==1.6.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like the astroid bug was fixed on a new release :)
|
I pin all the lint deps to their latest stable release |
|
👍 |
Due prospector-dev/prospector@f866efc#diff-2eeaed663bd0d25b7e608891384b7298 pylint-django and pylint-celery aren't installed by default.
There isn't a changelog for the 0.12.9 version but it was released on pypi :/