-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update of documentation of autoremove command #2060
Update of documentation of autoremove command #2060
Conversation
Installonly packages are handled by autoremove command in a similar way like other package. Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-15902
Leaf packages term is not define in documentation and it even represent different set of packages that are showed by leaves command. Related: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELDOCS-17711
Installonly packages are once more mentioned as those not affected by autoremove command in Lines 800 to 806 in 96f8d79
I think this command also does not do any special handling for installonly packages and the documentation should be updated accordingly. |
The described behavior differs from current behavior therefore it might create a confusion.
I think that formal description was valid in past. I remember that DNF had a problem in inheritance of kernel reason therefore it somehow mark all installonly packages as user installed or unknown. Hopefully the issue is gone. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Anyway I have a bad news. DNF does not keep reason of installonly packages. But I have to doublecheck |
I tried following:
|
I did a quick test on fresh F39 virtual machine where it seems OK. But your case doesn't look all right, indeed.
But still - we do not plan to change |
Please do not merge it till the installonly packages reason issue is properly investigated. |
The trigger of the issue with reasons is removal of one of the installonly packages. |
@j-mracek I think this is good to go now. Any complaints against removing |
No description provided.