Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

optimize timeout judgement according to different condition #187

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2018
Merged

optimize timeout judgement according to different condition #187

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ef574a7
optimize timeout judgement according to different condition
jwang11 Jan 22, 2018
08ab218
replace cv->wait(lock) with cv->wait(lock, predicate) and simplify ti…
jwang11 Jan 25, 2018
128309e
Improve logic to return TIMEOUT when not hasData && timeout->sec/nsec==0
jwang11 Jan 31, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 6 additions & 15 deletions rmw_fastrtps_cpp/src/rmw_wait.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -148,17 +148,16 @@ rmw_wait(
// If wait_timeout is not null and either of its fields are nonzero, we have to wait
bool hasToWait = (wait_timeout && (wait_timeout->sec > 0 || wait_timeout->nsec > 0)) ||
!wait_timeout;
hasToWait &= !check_wait_set_for_data(subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients);
bool hasData = check_wait_set_for_data(subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients);
auto predicate = [subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients]() {
return check_wait_set_for_data(subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients);
};

bool timeout = false;

if (hasToWait) {
if (hasToWait && !hasData) {
if (!wait_timeout) {
conditionVariable->wait(lock);
conditionVariable->wait(lock, predicate);
} else {
auto predicate = [subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients]() {
return check_wait_set_for_data(subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients);
};
auto n = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::nanoseconds>(
std::chrono::seconds(wait_timeout->sec));
n += std::chrono::nanoseconds(wait_timeout->nsec);
Expand All @@ -173,14 +172,6 @@ rmw_wait(
// after we check, it will be caught on the next call to this function).
lock.unlock();

// Even if this was a non-blocking wait, signal a timeout if there's no data.
// This makes the return behavior consistent with rcl expectations for zero timeout value.
// Do this before detaching the listeners because the data gets cleared for guard conditions.
bool hasData = check_wait_set_for_data(subscriptions, guard_conditions, services, clients);
if (!hasData && wait_timeout && wait_timeout->sec == 0 && wait_timeout->nsec == 0) {
timeout = true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this is what causes the tests to fail. If the timeout is reached (even if the timeout is 0) RMW_RET_TIMEOUT should be returned (or at least that's what the test expects)

}

if (subscriptions) {
for (size_t i = 0; i < subscriptions->subscriber_count; ++i) {
void * data = subscriptions->subscribers[i];
Expand Down