-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update superflore to generate new overrides syntax #284
Comments
I cannot assign to myself, but I'll be working on this. |
shr-project
added a commit
to shr-project/superflore
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2021
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291 * this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with: ros/meta-ros#902 but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new syntax directly with superflore. * it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister) do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from corresponding branch is being used). * fixes ros-infrastructure#284 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
shr-project
added a commit
to shr-project/superflore
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2021
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291 * this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with: ros/meta-ros#902 but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new syntax directly with superflore. * it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister) do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from corresponding branch is being used). * fixes ros-infrastructure#284 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
herb-kuta-lge
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 3, 2022
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291 * this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with: ros/meta-ros#902 but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new syntax directly with superflore. * it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister) do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from corresponding branch is being used). * fixes #284 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
zffgithub
pushed a commit
to zffgithub/superflore
that referenced
this issue
Apr 11, 2023
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291 * this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with: ros/meta-ros#902 but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new syntax directly with superflore. * it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister) do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from corresponding branch is being used). * fixes ros-infrastructure#284 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Generate new syntax for OE recipes to match:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: