Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update superflore to generate new overrides syntax #284

Closed
shr-project opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #287
Closed

Update superflore to generate new overrides syntax #284

shr-project opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #287

Comments

@shr-project
Copy link
Contributor

shr-project commented Aug 5, 2021

@shr-project
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cannot assign to myself, but I'll be working on this.

shr-project added a commit to shr-project/superflore that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2021
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match:
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291

* this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with:
  ros/meta-ros#902
  but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new
  syntax directly with superflore.

* it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all
  currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister)
  do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from
  corresponding branch is being used).

* fixes ros-infrastructure#284

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
shr-project added a commit to shr-project/superflore that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2021
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match:
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291

* this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with:
  ros/meta-ros#902
  but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new
  syntax directly with superflore.

* it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all
  currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister)
  do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from
  corresponding branch is being used).

* fixes ros-infrastructure#284

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
herb-kuta-lge pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2022
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match:
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291

* this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with:
  ros/meta-ros#902
  but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new
  syntax directly with superflore.

* it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all
  currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister)
  do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from
  corresponding branch is being used).

* fixes #284

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
zffgithub pushed a commit to zffgithub/superflore that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
* generate new syntax for OE recipes to match:
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1260
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1279
  https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1291

* this was already done with conversion script in meta-ros with:
  ros/meta-ros#902
  but for new ROS Distribution releases we want to generate new
  syntax directly with superflore.

* it's not conditional based on OE release series, because all
  currently supported versions (dunfell, hardknott, honister)
  do support new syntax (when latest bitbake revision from
  corresponding branch is being used).

* fixes ros-infrastructure#284

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant