Added recursive print depth meta command. #85
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
perovic
force-pushed
the
RecursivePrintDepthMetaCommand
branch
from
e7a17d5 to
e0ff729
Compare
Implemented corresponding print behaviour.
perovic
force-pushed
the
RecursivePrintDepthMetaCommand
branch
from
e0ff729 to
68218bc
Compare
|
Not sure about the rationale here but could you rebase and add a test case for this functionality? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
@Axel-Naumann, shall we close this due to inactivity? |
|
@Axel-Naumann what should we do with this one? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
@Axel-Naumann should we close this one? |
|
At the risk of being repetitive 😁 @Axel-Naumann can we close this one? |
|
Let's close - we keep the code in this PR, but for now there has not been a lot of demand for the feature :-) |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implemented corresponding print behavior.
Maybe revise this meta command's behavior in the case of a missing argument (print out the current value, instead of toggling between two defaults), if it turns out to be more intuitive.