Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Circuit conversation - X-Core v. PCC-1200i #1

Open
rmackinnon opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Circuit conversation - X-Core v. PCC-1200i #1

rmackinnon opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@rmackinnon
Copy link
Owner

Moving conversation from closed issue to this thread to no bother the others on that thread.

@rmackinnon rmackinnon added the question Further information is requested label May 7, 2023
@rmackinnon rmackinnon self-assigned this May 7, 2023
@rmackinnon
Copy link
Owner Author

@gashtaan sorry to disappoint, but mine is not a modular unit. Mine has 12 static station terminals plus a common. I didn't think that I need the ability to expand my 9 zone need to some crazy number of valves. My general feeling, based on the the design in your schematic and what I've seen on my unit, there was no reason for them to redesign the circuit if they just needed to change the form factor. On the facepack, broad strokes seem to be they just moved stuff around and rerouted the PCB splitting up the valve control and the timer into the valve controller and facepack. There is a chance that in other versions (which do contain modules) the valve controller is a reworked circuit.

@rmackinnon
Copy link
Owner Author

@gashtaan Finished the initial schematic. There is some guess work to do there still. Cap values, some of the MCU lines to match up, and an educated guess on the non-populated devices, but solid idea of what is going on is there. Reverse voltage hurts my brain. I need hit this with a conductivity probe and see where things line up on the MCU for what I'm calling the enable lines.

There are some very interesting things going on for the additional control lines to allow for a zone to specifically be enabled via the Facepack (See signal CH_4_EN). I have no idea why they do this. Other non-populated devices would also allow for zones 1-3 to be controlled via the Facepack. Which I'm guessing aligns with the X-Core 4 zone?

@gashtaan
Copy link
Collaborator

@rmackinnon in X-Core units, there are few variously populated (pull up/down) resistors on IO pins of the MCU, their combination is recognized by the firmware to configure count of zones that the device support. I guess that EN signals you are following can be something similar.

@rmackinnon
Copy link
Owner Author

rmackinnon commented May 13, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants