s3: Support virtual hosted access (e.g. for Alibaba) #2528
Labels
type: feature suggestion
suggesting a new feature
Comments
ncw
added a commit
to ncw/restic
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2020
…okup This is to enable restic working with Alibaba cloud Fixes restic#2528
7 tasks
|
I've made an attempt at this - see #2535 It seems to work for me :-) See the PR for instructions |
ncw
added a commit
to ncw/restic
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2020
…okup This is to enable restic working with Alibaba cloud Fixes restic#2528
fd0
pushed a commit
to ncw/restic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2020
…okup This is to enable restic working with Alibaba cloud Fixes restic#2528
mfrischknecht
pushed a commit
to mfrischknecht/restic
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2022
…okup This is to enable restic working with Alibaba cloud Fixes restic#2528
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@haoshuwei reported that the s3 backend cannot be used at the moment with Alibaba, restic seems to use the wrong kind of access method (path-style vs. virtual-hosted style). This issue tracks fixing that using
minio-go. @ncw did some research already in #2520 (comment)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: