-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix item sorting for standard holdings #2243
Labels
client request
Issue reported by production libraries
enhancement
Improvement of an existing feature
f: professional ui
Professional interface
f: public ui
Public interface, as opposed to the professional interface
UX
User experience, ergonomy
Comments
iGormilhit
added
enhancement
Improvement of an existing feature
triage
p-Medium
Medium priority (to be solved within 1-2 years)
f: professional ui
Professional interface
f: public ui
Public interface, as opposed to the professional interface
UX
User experience, ergonomy
and removed
triage
labels
Jul 26, 2021
pronguen
changed the title
Sort items in a holdings by unit field value
Sort standard items in a standard holdings by unit field value
Jul 26, 2021
pronguen
removed
the
f: public ui
Public interface, as opposed to the professional interface
label
Oct 18, 2021
pronguen
changed the title
Sort standard items in a standard holdings by unit field value
Sort standard items in a standard holdings by unit (professional interface)
Oct 18, 2021
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
PascalRepond
changed the title
Sort standard items in a standard holdings by unit (professional interface)
Improve item sorting in standard holdings
Feb 21, 2022
PascalRepond
added
the
f: public ui
Public interface, as opposed to the professional interface
label
Feb 21, 2022
This issue is stale because it has been open 6 months with no activity. |
PascalRepond
removed
p-Medium
Medium priority (to be solved within 1-2 years)
stale
Stale or no longer relevant
labels
May 25, 2023
PascalRepond
changed the title
Improve item sorting in standard holdings
Fix item sorting for standard holdings
Jul 3, 2023
Garfield-fr
added a commit
to Garfield-fr/rero-ils
that referenced
this issue
Sep 19, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes rero#2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
to Garfield-fr/rero-ils
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes rero#2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
to Garfield-fr/rero-ils
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes rero#2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
to Garfield-fr/rero-ils
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes rero#2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes #2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes #2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes #2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes #2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Garfield-fr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2023
Items sorting on standard holdings takes into consideration the numerical values in the character string. * Closes #2243. * Fixes noquery configuration on items sort.⚠️ migration: items reindexing. Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
client request
Issue reported by production libraries
enhancement
Improvement of an existing feature
f: professional ui
Professional interface
f: public ui
Public interface, as opposed to the professional interface
UX
User experience, ergonomy
How it works
When a holdings (type standard) has a lot of items, the items are not sorted, thus finding a specific item is not an easy task.
Improvement suggestion
The items are sorted by the field unit (
enumerationAndChronology
) descending (higher unit to smaller unit). This sort should be alphabetical but should sort numbers by their numeric value and not as strings.Explore the collation keyword ES type: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/plugins/current/analysis-icu-collation-keyword-field.html
This concerns only standard holdings. Serial holdings are already sorted according to another logic.
Screenshot
Example of an holdings (within this document) where the items could be sorted by the unit field value: left pro, right public view
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: