Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop the setter methods cache in favour of respond_to? (see #472) #473

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chewi
Copy link
Contributor

@chewi chewi commented Nov 23, 2017

The cache was not being updated when new attributes were added, causing very strange behaviour. Any previously unseen attributes passed to new with send_only_modified_attributes enabled would be missing from the request parameters. This is because change tracking is only effective for setter methods.

Updating the cache turned out to be more expensive than not having a cache at all. Using respond_to? would be fastest but this breaks things as respond_to_missing? returns true for any assignment method.

If method(:foo=).source_location returns nil then this may indicate that the method is missing but this is also true for methods in native code.

A faster and more reliable approach is using a fiber-local variable to make respond_to_missing? return false while doing these checks. It's a tad ugly but it's the best I can come up with.

@chewi chewi force-pushed the remove-setter-methods-cache branch from d11b81b to 9a952e6 Compare May 3, 2018 10:15
@chewi
Copy link
Contributor Author

chewi commented May 3, 2018

Rebased. I think this one is particularly important and it stands alone from my other remaining changes.

The cache was not being updated when new attributes were added,
causing very strange behaviour. Any previously unseen attributes
passed to new with send_only_modified_attributes enabled would be
missing from the request parameters. This is because change tracking
is only effective for setter methods.

Updating the cache turned out to be more expensive than not having a
cache at all. Using respond_to? would be fastest but this breaks
things as respond_to_missing? returns true for any assignment method.

If method(:foo=).source_location returns nil then this may indicate
that the method is missing but this is also true for methods in native
code.

A faster and more reliable approach is using a fiber-local variable to
make respond_to_missing? return false while doing these checks. It's a
tad ugly but it's the best I can come up with.
@chewi
Copy link
Contributor Author

chewi commented Sep 19, 2018

I'm leaving the company soon and I'd like to get some (or all!) of these merged before I go. This one seems like a good start.

@chewi
Copy link
Contributor Author

chewi commented Oct 23, 2018

One week to go. 😛

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant