fetchBaseQuery: expose extraOptions to prepareHeaders #4291
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 896e4df:
|
✅ Deploy Preview for redux-starter-kit-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
size-limit report 📦
|
EskiMojo14
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2024
|
Would you prefer it like this or without the generic and just |
|
definitely the generic |
markerikson
force-pushed
the
pr/fetchBaseQuery-extraOptions
branch
from
968c2f6 to
1f38356
Compare
markerikson
force-pushed
the
pr/fetchBaseQuery-extraOptions
branch
from
1f38356 to
41487fd
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Triggered by #4290 and the fact that we had similar asks before. Not sure if the extra generic arg is worth it. Thoughts, @EskiMojo14 & @markerikson ?