Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

s/segment: fixed tracking offsets of empty segments #11450

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

mmaslankaprv
Copy link
Member

@mmaslankaprv mmaslankaprv commented Jun 15, 2023

When a segment is rolled due to the segment.ms property its base offset is set to the committed offset of last segment plus one. In a segment constructor all segment offset tracker offsets were set to the base offset passed as the constructor argument. This way an empty segment had exactly the same set of offsets as the segment containing single batch containing one record and base offset equal to the segment base offset.

Incorrect offset accounting in empty segments lead to the situation in which eviction driven log::truncate_prefix was called with an incorrect offset, leading to the situation in which a log wasn't truncated at the segment boundary. This in the end resulted in the disconnection between the offset translator truncation point and first log segment start offset.

For example:

(we represent segment as [base_offset,end_offset])

In the case of log with segments:

[0,10][11,15]

After segment ms a new segment is created like this:

[0,10][11,15][16,16]

When eviction point is established the last offset is checked in this case if all the segments are to be evicted it will be equal to 16. 16 is a last offset that is going to be evicted (last included in raft snapshot). Hence the log::truncate_prefix is called with offset 17.

If some batches are appended to the rolled segment then the log will contain f.e.

 [0,10][11,15][16,25]

Now if the log is prefix truncated at offset 17 it starts offset is updated to 17 but the underlying segment is kept.

[16,25]

Now when the reader start reading the log it will request to start from the log start offset which is 17 but it will have to skip over the batch starting at 16. If a batch at 16 has more than one record it will still be returned to the reader and it will have to translate its base offset to kafka offset space. This is impossible as the offset_translator was already truncated to 16. i.e. there is no information in the translator to correctly translate the offset.

A fix is setting the empty segment dirty, committed and stable offset to its base_offset minus one. This way all the semantics of log operation holds as the offset returned is equal to previous segment last offset which would be the case if there would be no empty segment at the head of the log.

Fixes: #11403

Backports Required

  • none - not a bug fix
  • none - this is a backport
  • none - issue does not exist in previous branches
  • none - papercut/not impactful enough to backport
  • v23.1.x
  • v22.3.x
  • v22.2.x

Release Notes

Bug Fixes

  • fixes rare situation in which consumer may stuck due to incorrect truncation point

When a segment is rolled due to the `segment.ms` property its base
offset is set to the committed offset of last segment plus one. In a
segment constructor all segment offset tracker offsets were set to the
base offset passed as the constructor argument. This way an empty
segment had exactly the same set of offsets as the segment containing
single batch containing one record and base offset equal to the segment
base offset.

Incorrect offset accounting in empty segments lead to the situation in
which eviction driven `log::truncate_prefix` was called with an
incorrect offset, leading to the situation in which a log wasn't
truncated at the segment boundary. This in the end resulted in the
disconnection between the offset translator truncation point and first
log segment start offset.

For example:

(we represent segment as `[base_offset,end_offset]`)

In the case of log with segments:

```
[0,10][11,15]
```

After segment ms a new segment is created like this:

```
[0,10][11,15][16,16]
```

When eviction point is established the last offset is checked in this
case if all the segments are to be evicted it will be equal to 16.
`16` is a last offset that is going to be evicted (last included in raft
snapshot). Hence the `log::truncate_prefix` is called with offset `17`.

If some batches are appended to the rolled segment then the log will
contain f.e.

```
 [0,10][11,15][16,25]
```

Now if the log is prefix truncated at offset `17` it starts offset is
updated to `17` but the underlying segment is kept.

```
[16,25]
```

Now when the reader start reading the log it will request to start from
the log start offset which is `17` but it will have to skip over the
batch starting at `16`. If a batch at `16` has more than one record it
will still be returned to the reader and it will have to translate its
base offset to kafka offset space. This is impossible as the
offset_translator was already truncated to `16`. i.e. there is no
information in the translator to correctly translate the offset.

A fix is setting the empty segment dirty, committed and stable offset to
its base_offset minus one. This way all the semantics of log operation
holds as the offset returned is equal to previous segment last offset
which would be the case if there would be no empty segment at the head
of the log.

Fixes: redpanda-data#11403

Signed-off-by: Michal Maslanka <[email protected]>
Validating offsets in the compaction test uses committed offset but it
didn't flush the log before validation.

Signed-off-by: Michal Maslanka <[email protected]>
@mmaslankaprv mmaslankaprv marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2023 16:32
@andijcr
Copy link
Contributor

andijcr commented Jun 16, 2023

lgtm, the only concern I have is if some code expects that committed_offset >= base_offset

andijcr
andijcr previously approved these changes Jun 16, 2023
tests/rptest/tests/log_segment_ms_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/rptest/tests/log_segment_ms_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@piyushredpanda piyushredpanda merged commit 7313c17 into redpanda-data:dev Jun 19, 2023
@vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Collaborator

/backport v23.1.x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

runtime_error: log offset is outside the translation range
4 participants