Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: reorder imports via prettier #286

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

schultzp2020
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Please explain the changes you made here.

Reorders the imports to maintain parity with the janus plugins repo. janus-idp/backstage-plugins#419

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

N/A

PR acceptance criteria

Please make sure that the following steps are complete:

  • GitHub Actions are completed and successful
  • Unit Tests are updated and passing
  • E2E Tests are updated and passing
  • Documentation is updated if necessary
  • Add a screenshot if the change is UX/UI related

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 1, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f37650c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Comment on lines 96 to 80
<Route
path="/tech-radar"
element={<TechRadarPage width={1500} height={800} id="default" />}
/>
<Route path="/tech-radar" element={<TechRadarPage width={1500} height={800} id="default" />} />
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I see that a lot of these have been collapsed, I don't really have a preference either way but I wonder what other people think about the difference between the two? @christophe-f

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I think having print width of 100 characters is better because we are working on screens that can support more than 80 characters lol.

PatAKnight
PatAKnight previously approved these changes Jun 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@PatAKnight PatAKnight left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@christophe-f christophe-f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed several times, we need to stay in parity with upstream. This PR will not be merged.

@christophe-f christophe-f deleted the import-order branch June 2, 2023 03:52
@schultzp2020 schultzp2020 restored the import-order branch June 2, 2023 13:06
@schultzp2020 schultzp2020 reopened this Jun 2, 2023
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@schultzp2020
Copy link
Collaborator Author

schultzp2020 commented Jun 2, 2023

As discussed several times, we need to stay in parity with upstream. This PR will not be merged.

@christophe-f We have already merged a PR like this in janus-idp/backstage-plugins#419. The only changes with this PR is to the import order and it does not diverge in anything else from the upstream.

@schultzp2020 schultzp2020 deleted the import-order branch July 13, 2023 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants