-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add move method to automation rule #5998
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8104b3d
Add move method to automation rule
stsewd 0424d5e
Use update
stsewd b2af198
Merge branch 'update-automation-rules-model' into add-move-method
stsewd dc8b8c1
Sort imports
stsewd 20919ff
Merge branch 'master' into add-move-method
stsewd e397107
Use save
stsewd 4f7423a
Typo
stsewd 564ab5e
More tests
stsewd 9aa2cc8
Merge branch 'master' into add-move-method
stsewd 1ca9c0d
Merge branch 'update-automation-rules-model' into add-move-method
stsewd 800da89
Override delete
stsewd 5dacb27
Linter
stsewd 422a7c8
Merge branch 'update-automation-rules-model' into add-move-method
stsewd 3afa100
Refactor
stsewd a546981
Merge branch 'update-automation-rules-model' into add-move-method
stsewd 32f05c0
update docstring
stsewd 8c9ad3b
Merge branch 'master' into add-move-method
stsewd 4607ac0
Update docstring
stsewd bad40c3
Linter
stsewd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens if we hit an exception here? The rule will be stuck with a broken priority. We likely need this to happen in some kind of DB transaction to avoid bad states here.
This feels really complicated and brittle. I don't have a better suggestion currently, but I'm wondering if this concept of priority is something we need to enforce so strongly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have transactions per request
readthedocs.org/readthedocs/settings/base.py
Line 33 in 59738a1
So, we need to have a unique priority in all rules of a project, that way they get sorted how the user wants.
We can remove the unique constraint as Manuel suggested, and maybe check for inconsistencies on save?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, I guess we can keep this for now, but I'm guessing it will cause issues at some point :)