Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop tick() from LoopInterface #72

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2017
Merged

Conversation

jsor
Copy link
Member

@jsor jsor commented Feb 3, 2017

References: #52 (comment), async-interop/event-loop#9

For the tests, i've added a helper function to TestCase.

Closes #52

@jsor jsor added the BC break label Feb 3, 2017
Copy link
Member

@clue clue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes 👍

This has been discussed plenty of times already and we have yet to come up with a use case that actually needs the tick() method. Removing this makes perfect sense, it avoids plenty of issues related to it, reduces implementation complexity and perceived external complexity (smaller public API).

@jsor jsor added this to the v0.5 milestone Feb 3, 2017
@jsor
Copy link
Member Author

jsor commented Feb 3, 2017

I'd like to hear from @WyriHaximus about this because IIRC he's using tick() in a few of his libs.

Copy link
Member

@WyriHaximus WyriHaximus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jsor Glad to see this horrible hack go 👍 . I use it in one lib, but don't really recommend it, and really would prefer not to use and have it at all.

@jsor
Copy link
Member Author

jsor commented Feb 3, 2017

Since this a BC break, i'd like to have also @cboden's approval here.

@cboden cboden self-requested a review February 3, 2017 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants