Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix BaseInput missing ref binding #102

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fwl25
Copy link

@fwl25 fwl25 commented Jan 1, 2025

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 增强了 Input 组件的引用能力,允许外部组件访问原生输入元素。
  • 测试

    • Input 组件的 nativeElement 属性添加了新的测试用例,提高了组件测试覆盖率。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 1, 2025

概述

演练

该拉取请求修改了 src/Input.tsx 中的 Input 组件,通过在 BaseInput 组件中添加 holderRef 引用。这一变更允许 Input 组件传递一个引用,用于管理输入元素的原生 DOM 元素。修改不会改变现有功能,而是增强了组件暴露底层 DOM 元素引用的能力。

变更

文件 变更摘要
src/Input.tsx BaseInput 组件中添加 ref={holderRef} 属性
tests/index.test.tsx 新增 nativeElement 属性的测试用例,覆盖不同输入组件配置

序列图

sequenceDiagram
    participant Parent as 父组件
    participant Input as Input组件
    participant BaseInput as BaseInput组件
    participant NativeElement as 原生输入元素

    Parent ->> Input: 传递holderRef
    Input ->> BaseInput: 应用holderRef
    BaseInput ->> NativeElement: 引用底层DOM元素
Loading

可能相关的拉取请求

兔子诗歌

🐰 输入的魔法,引用闪耀
DOM元素藏在代码怀抱
holderRef轻轻牵引
组件的秘密,悄然绽放
测试覆盖,如春风拂面 🌱


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1368c9e and a363bfd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Input.tsx (1 hunks)
  • tests/index.test.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Input.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/index.test.tsx (4)

457-458: 测试用例结构清晰,范围限定明确
这些新增的测试用例通过 describe('nativeElement', ...) 分组,能让人直接理解测试的目的和范围。建议在注释中强调此分组适用于 nativeElement 的各种场景,方便阅读者查找和维护。


459-463: 覆盖 “is input” 场景逻辑充分
测试断言验证了 nativeElement 是否为 rc-input,逻辑符合预期且可读性强。通常情况下,这种简单断言非常直观明了,无需额外改动。


465-476: 测试“is affix wrapper”场景有效
此用例验证了前后缀时 nativeElement 是否引用到 .rc-input-affix-wrapper,可提高对前后缀功能的安全感。该断言可以帮助快速发现前后缀包装层发生变动时的潜在问题,测试设计合理。


478-491: 测试“is group wrapper”场景覆盖性强
在有 addonBefore 和 addonAfter 等复杂组合的场景下,检查 nativeElement 是否确定为 .rc-input-group-wrapper,对多种配置下的引用一致性提供了保证。此处断言清晰有力,未发现明显改善需求。


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant