-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement step_by #494
Comments
It should be possible, yes. I think I'd prefer to wait for |
The iterator is now in stable since a while :) |
This would be a very useful feature 😄 |
Can i try to implement it? |
Go for it! |
I have created a pull request adding this future, but It depend on std StepBy being a double ended iterator. This trait as bean stabilise in rustc 1.38. Does bumping the minimal rustc version is acceptable for this future? |
I don't think we should bump the MSRV for this feature. We can either implement our own version of the |
726: add step by parallel iterator. r=cuviper a=FlyingCanoe this is a pull request for the #494. It add a step_by iterator for `IndexedParallelIterator` producing a iterator that is also indexed parallel iterator. It is Implemented in pull mode. Co-authored-by: flyingcanoe <[email protected]>
726: add step by parallel iterator. r=cuviper a=FlyingCanoe this is a pull request for the #494. It add a step_by iterator for `IndexedParallelIterator` producing a iterator that is also indexed parallel iterator. It is Implemented in pull mode. Co-authored-by: flyingcanoe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <[email protected]>
I think that this #726 was supposed to close this. :) |
Yes, thanks! |
I believe this should be parallelizable? The iterator is currently in nightly rust:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.step_by
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: