[WIP] Fix valgrind tests. #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
robertnishihara
force-pushed
the
valgrind
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fa0e9a3
to
408f38b
Compare
pcmoritz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2016
add custom callbacks for serialization
richardliaw
referenced
this pull request
in richardliaw/ray
Oct 4, 2017
(redo of #4 which was dropped)
devin-petersohn
referenced
this pull request
in devin-petersohn/ray
Mar 16, 2018
* Adding fixes * Adding iterrows update
devin-petersohn
referenced
this pull request
in devin-petersohn/ray
Mar 28, 2018
* Adding fixes * Adding iterrows update
bentzinir
pushed a commit
to bentzinir/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2020
2 tasks
6 tasks
kfstorm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is: ``` #0 0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #1 0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #2 0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #3 0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #4 0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #5 0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #6 0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #7 0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #8 0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #9 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369 ``` The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`). It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`. The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though. BTW, I've tried different approaches: 1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well. 2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe.
Rohan138
pushed a commit
to Rohan138/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is: ``` #0 0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 ray-project#1 0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#2 0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#3 0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#4 0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#5 0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#6 0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#7 0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#8 0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#9 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369 ``` The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`). It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`. The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though. BTW, I've tried different approaches: 1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well. 2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe. Signed-off-by: Rohan138 <[email protected]>
Stefan-1313
pushed a commit
to Stefan-1313/ray_mod
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2022
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is: ``` #0 0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 ray-project#1 0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#2 0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#3 0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#4 0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#5 0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so ray-project#6 0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#7 0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#8 0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#9 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ray-project#11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ray-project#14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 ray-project#16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369 ``` The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`). It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`. The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though. BTW, I've tried different approaches: 1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well. 2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe. Signed-off-by: Stefan van der Kleij <[email protected]>
ericl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2023
ProjectsByJackHe
pushed a commit
to ProjectsByJackHe/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jack He <[email protected]>
peytondmurray
referenced
this pull request
in peytondmurray/ray
Mar 22, 2023
elliottower
pushed a commit
to elliottower/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2023
Signed-off-by: elliottower <[email protected]>
ProjectsByJackHe
pushed a commit
to ProjectsByJackHe/ray
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jack He <[email protected]>
sven1977
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.