Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge pull request #1 from raspberrypi/rpi-4.4.y #1523

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Merge pull request #1 from raspberrypi/rpi-4.4.y #1523

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

escalator2015
Copy link

Update

HiassofT pushed a commit to HiassofT/rpi-linux that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2016
When the first propgated copy was a slave the following oops would result:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
> IP: [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> PGD bacd4067 PUD bac66067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [raspberrypi#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 824 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5userns+ raspberrypi#1523
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
> task: ffff8800bb0a8000 ti: ffff8800bac3c000 task.ti: ffff8800bac3c000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811fba4e>]  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> RSP: 0018:ffff8800bac3fd38  EFLAGS: 00010283
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800bb77ec00 RCX: 0000000000000010
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8800bb58c000 RDI: ffff8800bb58c480
> RBP: ffff8800bac3fd48 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000001ca1 R11: 0000000000001c9d R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffff8800ba713800 R14: ffff8800bac3fda0 R15: ffff8800bb77ec00
> FS:  00007f3c0cd9b7e0(0000) GS:ffff8800bfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 00000000bb79d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
>  ffff8800bb77ec00 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fd88 ffffffff811fbf85
>  ffff8800bac3fd98 ffff8800bb77f080 ffff8800ba713800 ffff8800bb262b40
>  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fdd8 ffffffff811f1da0
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff811fbf85>] propagate_mnt+0x105/0x140
>  [<ffffffff811f1da0>] attach_recursive_mnt+0x120/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff811f1ec3>] graft_tree+0x63/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f1f6b>] do_add_mount+0x9b/0x100
>  [<ffffffff811f2c1a>] do_mount+0x2aa/0xdf0
>  [<ffffffff8117efbe>] ? strndup_user+0x4e/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f3a45>] SyS_mount+0x75/0xc0
>  [<ffffffff8100242b>] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff81988f3c>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> Code: 00 00 75 ec 48 89 0d 02 22 22 01 8b 89 10 01 00 00 48 89 05 fd 21 22 01 39 8e 10 01 00 00 0f 84 e0 00 00 00 48 8b 80 d8 00 00 00 <48> 8b 50 10 48 89 05 df 21 22 01 48 89 15 d0 21 22 01 8b 53 30
> RIP  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
>  RSP <ffff8800bac3fd38>
> CR2: 0000000000000010
> ---[ end trace 2725ecd95164f217 ]---

This oops happens with the namespace_sem held and can be triggered by
non-root users.  An all around not pleasant experience.

To avoid this scenario when finding the appropriate source mount to
copy stop the walk up the mnt_master chain when the first source mount
is encountered.

Further rewrite the walk up the last_source mnt_master chain so that
it is clear what is going on.

The reason why the first source mount is special is that it it's
mnt_parent is not a mount in the dest_mnt propagation tree, and as
such termination conditions based up on the dest_mnt mount propgation
tree do not make sense.

To avoid other kinds of confusion last_dest is not changed when
computing last_source.  last_dest is only used once in propagate_one
and that is above the point of the code being modified, so changing
the global variable is meaningless and confusing.

Cc: [email protected]
fixes: f2ebb3a ("smarter propagate_mnt()")
Reported-by: Tycho Andersen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
anholt pushed a commit to anholt/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2016
commit 5ec0811 upstream.

When the first propgated copy was a slave the following oops would result:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
> IP: [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> PGD bacd4067 PUD bac66067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 824 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5userns+ raspberrypi#1523
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
> task: ffff8800bb0a8000 ti: ffff8800bac3c000 task.ti: ffff8800bac3c000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811fba4e>]  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> RSP: 0018:ffff8800bac3fd38  EFLAGS: 00010283
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800bb77ec00 RCX: 0000000000000010
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8800bb58c000 RDI: ffff8800bb58c480
> RBP: ffff8800bac3fd48 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000001ca1 R11: 0000000000001c9d R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffff8800ba713800 R14: ffff8800bac3fda0 R15: ffff8800bb77ec00
> FS:  00007f3c0cd9b7e0(0000) GS:ffff8800bfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 00000000bb79d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
>  ffff8800bb77ec00 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fd88 ffffffff811fbf85
>  ffff8800bac3fd98 ffff8800bb77f080 ffff8800ba713800 ffff8800bb262b40
>  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fdd8 ffffffff811f1da0
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff811fbf85>] propagate_mnt+0x105/0x140
>  [<ffffffff811f1da0>] attach_recursive_mnt+0x120/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff811f1ec3>] graft_tree+0x63/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f1f6b>] do_add_mount+0x9b/0x100
>  [<ffffffff811f2c1a>] do_mount+0x2aa/0xdf0
>  [<ffffffff8117efbe>] ? strndup_user+0x4e/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f3a45>] SyS_mount+0x75/0xc0
>  [<ffffffff8100242b>] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff81988f3c>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> Code: 00 00 75 ec 48 89 0d 02 22 22 01 8b 89 10 01 00 00 48 89 05 fd 21 22 01 39 8e 10 01 00 00 0f 84 e0 00 00 00 48 8b 80 d8 00 00 00 <48> 8b 50 10 48 89 05 df 21 22 01 48 89 15 d0 21 22 01 8b 53 30
> RIP  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
>  RSP <ffff8800bac3fd38>
> CR2: 0000000000000010
> ---[ end trace 2725ecd95164f217 ]---

This oops happens with the namespace_sem held and can be triggered by
non-root users.  An all around not pleasant experience.

To avoid this scenario when finding the appropriate source mount to
copy stop the walk up the mnt_master chain when the first source mount
is encountered.

Further rewrite the walk up the last_source mnt_master chain so that
it is clear what is going on.

The reason why the first source mount is special is that it it's
mnt_parent is not a mount in the dest_mnt propagation tree, and as
such termination conditions based up on the dest_mnt mount propgation
tree do not make sense.

To avoid other kinds of confusion last_dest is not changed when
computing last_source.  last_dest is only used once in propagate_one
and that is above the point of the code being modified, so changing
the global variable is meaningless and confusing.

fixes: f2ebb3a ("smarter propagate_mnt()")
Reported-by: Tycho Andersen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
kraj pushed a commit to kraj/linux-raspberrypi that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2017
commit 5ec0811 upstream.

When the first propgated copy was a slave the following oops would result:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
> IP: [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> PGD bacd4067 PUD bac66067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [raspberrypi#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 824 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5userns+ raspberrypi#1523
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
> task: ffff8800bb0a8000 ti: ffff8800bac3c000 task.ti: ffff8800bac3c000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811fba4e>]  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
> RSP: 0018:ffff8800bac3fd38  EFLAGS: 00010283
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800bb77ec00 RCX: 0000000000000010
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8800bb58c000 RDI: ffff8800bb58c480
> RBP: ffff8800bac3fd48 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000001ca1 R11: 0000000000001c9d R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffff8800ba713800 R14: ffff8800bac3fda0 R15: ffff8800bb77ec00
> FS:  00007f3c0cd9b7e0(0000) GS:ffff8800bfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 00000000bb79d000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
>  ffff8800bb77ec00 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fd88 ffffffff811fbf85
>  ffff8800bac3fd98 ffff8800bb77f080 ffff8800ba713800 ffff8800bb262b40
>  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8800bac3fdd8 ffffffff811f1da0
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff811fbf85>] propagate_mnt+0x105/0x140
>  [<ffffffff811f1da0>] attach_recursive_mnt+0x120/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff811f1ec3>] graft_tree+0x63/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f1f6b>] do_add_mount+0x9b/0x100
>  [<ffffffff811f2c1a>] do_mount+0x2aa/0xdf0
>  [<ffffffff8117efbe>] ? strndup_user+0x4e/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811f3a45>] SyS_mount+0x75/0xc0
>  [<ffffffff8100242b>] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff81988f3c>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> Code: 00 00 75 ec 48 89 0d 02 22 22 01 8b 89 10 01 00 00 48 89 05 fd 21 22 01 39 8e 10 01 00 00 0f 84 e0 00 00 00 48 8b 80 d8 00 00 00 <48> 8b 50 10 48 89 05 df 21 22 01 48 89 15 d0 21 22 01 8b 53 30
> RIP  [<ffffffff811fba4e>] propagate_one+0xbe/0x1c0
>  RSP <ffff8800bac3fd38>
> CR2: 0000000000000010
> ---[ end trace 2725ecd95164f217 ]---

This oops happens with the namespace_sem held and can be triggered by
non-root users.  An all around not pleasant experience.

To avoid this scenario when finding the appropriate source mount to
copy stop the walk up the mnt_master chain when the first source mount
is encountered.

Further rewrite the walk up the last_source mnt_master chain so that
it is clear what is going on.

The reason why the first source mount is special is that it it's
mnt_parent is not a mount in the dest_mnt propagation tree, and as
such termination conditions based up on the dest_mnt mount propgation
tree do not make sense.

To avoid other kinds of confusion last_dest is not changed when
computing last_source.  last_dest is only used once in propagate_one
and that is above the point of the code being modified, so changing
the global variable is meaningless and confusing.

fixes: f2ebb3a ("smarter propagate_mnt()")
Reported-by: Tycho Andersen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2019
the msg lock is taken for multi-link cases only but released
unconditionally, leading to an unlock balance warning for single-link usages
This patch fixes this.

 =====================================
 WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
 5.1.0-16506-gc1c383a6f0a2-dirty #1523 Tainted: G        W
 -------------------------------------
 aplay/2954 is trying to release lock (&bus->msg_lock) at:
 do_bank_switch+0x21c/0x480
 but there are no more locks to release!

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sanyog Kale <[email protected]>
[vkoul: edited the change log as suggested by Pierre]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2019
[ Upstream commit 9315d90 ]

the msg lock is taken for multi-link cases only but released
unconditionally, leading to an unlock balance warning for single-link usages
This patch fixes this.

 =====================================
 WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
 5.1.0-16506-gc1c383a6f0a2-dirty #1523 Tainted: G        W
 -------------------------------------
 aplay/2954 is trying to release lock (&bus->msg_lock) at:
 do_bank_switch+0x21c/0x480
 but there are no more locks to release!

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sanyog Kale <[email protected]>
[vkoul: edited the change log as suggested by Pierre]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant