3.10.y build failure in rtl8192cu after 'make bcmrpi_defconfig' #325
Comments
|
Only bcrpi_quick_defconfig is tested. This is the reason we're reluctant to pull in out of tree drivers. |
|
Confirmed that |
|
Fixed with most recent commit - thanks! |
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2014
Soothes the following checkpatch warnings:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#151: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:151:
+ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, -1, -1, -1, -1, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 12, 13, 24, 5, 22, 23,
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxW)
#325: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:325:
+ ret= mask_and_set_register_interruptible(ab8500, bank, reg,
^
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#418: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:418:
+ else if (offset >= AB9540_INT_GPIO50R && offset <= AB9540_INT_GPIO54R)
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#420: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:420:
+ else if (offset == AB8540_INT_GPIO43R || offset == AB8540_INT_GPIO44R)
ERROR: spaces required around that '==' (ctx:VxV)
#454: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:454:
+ if ((i==3) && (*offset >= 24))
^
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#576: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:576:
+ .map = ab8500_irq_map,$
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#576: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:576:
+ .map = ab8500_irq_map,$
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#577: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:577:
+ .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,$
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#577: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:577:
+ .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,$
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#1554: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1554:
+ static char *switch_off_status[] = {
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#1563: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1563:
+ static char *turn_on_status[] = {
WARNING: sizeof *ab8500 should be sizeof(*ab8500)
#1582: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1582:
+ ab8500 = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof *ab8500, GFP_KERNEL);
ERROR: space required after that close brace '}'
#1639: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1639:
+ }/* Configure AB8500 or AB9540 IRQ */
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#1652: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1652:
+ ab8500->oldmask = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, ab8500->mask_size, GFP_KERNEL);
WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_cont([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_cont(dev, ... then pr_cont(... to printk(KERN_CONT ...
#1677: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1677:
+ printk(KERN_CONT " \"%s\"",
WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_cont([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_cont(dev, ... then pr_cont(... to printk(KERN_CONT ...
#1682: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1682:
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_cont([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_cont(dev, ... then pr_cont(... to printk(KERN_CONT ...
#1684: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1684:
+ printk(KERN_CONT " None\n");
WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
#1695: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1695:
+ printk("\"%s\" ", turn_on_status[i]);
WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
#1700: FILE: drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:1700:
+ printk("None\n");
total: 5 errors, 14 warnings, 1869 lines checked
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
sigmaris
pushed a commit
to sigmaris/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2019
…s locked down") Running the latest kernel through my "make instances" stress tests, I triggered the following bug (with KASAN and kmemleak enabled): mkdir invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x40cd0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_RECLAIMABLE), order=0, oom_score_adj=0 CPU: 1 PID: 2229 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 5.4.0-rc2-test raspberrypi#325 Hardware name: MSI MS-7823/CSM-H87M-G43 (MS-7823), BIOS V1.6 02/22/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x64/0x8c dump_header+0x43/0x3b7 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x48/0x4a oom_kill_process+0x68/0x2d5 out_of_memory+0x2aa/0x2d0 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x96d/0xb67 __alloc_pages_node+0x19/0x1e alloc_slab_page+0x17/0x45 new_slab+0xd0/0x234 ___slab_alloc.constprop.86+0x18f/0x336 ? alloc_inode+0x2c/0x74 ? irq_trace+0x12/0x1e ? tracer_hardirqs_off+0x1d/0xd7 ? __slab_alloc.constprop.85+0x21/0x53 __slab_alloc.constprop.85+0x31/0x53 ? __slab_alloc.constprop.85+0x31/0x53 ? alloc_inode+0x2c/0x74 kmem_cache_alloc+0x50/0x179 ? alloc_inode+0x2c/0x74 alloc_inode+0x2c/0x74 new_inode_pseudo+0xf/0x48 new_inode+0x15/0x25 tracefs_get_inode+0x23/0x7c ? lookup_one_len+0x54/0x6c tracefs_create_file+0x53/0x11d trace_create_file+0x15/0x33 event_create_dir+0x2a3/0x34b __trace_add_new_event+0x1c/0x26 event_trace_add_tracer+0x56/0x86 trace_array_create+0x13e/0x1e1 instance_mkdir+0x8/0x17 tracefs_syscall_mkdir+0x39/0x50 ? get_dname+0x31/0x31 vfs_mkdir+0x78/0xa3 do_mkdirat+0x71/0xb0 sys_mkdir+0x19/0x1b do_fast_syscall_32+0xb0/0xed I bisected this down to the addition of the proxy_ops into tracefs for lockdown. It appears that the allocation of the proxy_ops and then freeing it in the destroy_inode callback, is causing havoc with the memory system. Reading the documentation about destroy_inode and talking with Linus about this, this is buggy and wrong. When defining the destroy_inode() method, it is expected that the destroy_inode() will also free the inode, and not just the extra allocations done in the creation of the inode. The faulty commit causes a memory leak of the inode data structure when they are deleted. Instead of allocating the proxy_ops (and then having to free it) the checks should be done by the open functions themselves, and not hack into the tracefs directory. First revert the tracefs updates for locked_down and then later we can add the locked_down checks in the kernel/trace files. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: ccbd54f ("tracefs: Restrict tracefs when the kernel is locked down") Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 21, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 22, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 27, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2022
Commit 5f64ce5 ("iommu/vt-d: Duplicate iommu_resv_region objects per device list") converted rcu_lock in get_resv_regions to dmar_global_lock to allow sleeping in iommu_alloc_resv_region(). This introduced possible recursive locking if get_resv_regions is called from within a section where intel_iommu_init() already holds dmar_global_lock. Especially, after commit 57365a0 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration"), below lockdep splats could always be seen. ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.0.0-rc4+ #325 Tainted: G I -------------------------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffa8a18c90 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa8a18c90 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: intel_iommu_init+0x36d/0x6ea ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x5f __lock_acquire.cold.73+0xad/0x2bb lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2e0 ? intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9d/0x110 down_read+0x42/0x150 ? intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270 intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270 iommu_create_device_direct_mappings.isra.28+0x8d/0x1c0 ? iommu_get_dma_cookie+0x6d/0x90 bus_iommu_probe+0x19f/0x2e0 iommu_device_register+0xd4/0x130 intel_iommu_init+0x3e1/0x6ea ? iommu_setup+0x289/0x289 ? rdinit_setup+0x34/0x34 pci_iommu_init+0x12/0x3a do_one_initcall+0x65/0x320 ? rdinit_setup+0x34/0x34 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5a/0x80 kernel_init_freeable+0x28a/0x2f3 ? rest_init+0x1b0/0x1b0 kernel_init+0x1a/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> This rolls back dmar_global_lock to rcu_lock in get_resv_regions to avoid the lockdep splat. Fixes: 57365a0 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]> Tested-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Looks as if torvalds/linux@80e928f7 removed the
create_proc_entryfunction, which breaks certain drivers:Potentially affected code:
I've confirmed that the string in the version header is 199168 == 0x30A00 == 3.10.00.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: