Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"apt-get dist-upgrade" on a clean Raspbian 1.9 install outputs many pypy-upstream removal warnings #1373

Closed
DanTup opened this issue Mar 25, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

"apt-get dist-upgrade" on a clean Raspbian 1.9 install outputs many pypy-upstream removal warnings #1373

DanTup opened this issue Mar 25, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@DanTup
Copy link

DanTup commented Mar 25, 2016

I've tried this twice (once was a network install from NOOBS Lite, and more recently by downloading the full NOOBS install that has Raspbian 1.9 included from a few days ago). When I run "apt-get dist-upgrade" it says it's going to remove pypy-upstream-doc and update a bunch of other python-related stuff.

It then fills the screen with failures to remove non-entry directories (screenshot attached).

It's not clear whether these are leaving anything in a bad state, but I presume it's not expected.

screenshot 2016-03-25 at 11 21 20
@XECDesign
Copy link
Contributor

This is mostly harmless issue. It seems like the pypy-upstream package wasn't done very well and has been outdated for a while. We switched to Debian's pypy package, but when pypy-upstream removes itself, it leaves behind some cruft. This can be removed by (carefully) running sudo rm -rf /usr/lib/pypy-upstream.

Also, please note that this repo is for the linux kernel. If you would like to report other distro issues or continue the discussion on this particular issue, the best place for that is here
https://github.com/RPi-Distro/repo/issues/

@DanTup
Copy link
Author

DanTup commented Mar 25, 2016

Oops sorry, didn't realise (bit of a Pi/Linux noob!).

Thanks for the info, I wasn't sure if the new libs put stuff in the pypy-upstream folder or it was safe to remove. I'll just wipe it out in my setup script after the updates.

Thanks!

nathanchance pushed a commit to nathanchance/pi-kernel that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2018
@bebarino @gregkh
clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting during registration
9e9d9b1 
[ Upstream commit f8f8f1d ]

The orphan clocks reparent operation shouldn't touch the hardware
if clocks are enabled, otherwise it may get a chance to disable a
newly registered critical clock which triggers the warning below.

Assuming we have two clocks: A and B, B is the parent of A.
Clock A has flag: CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE
Clock B has flag: CLK_IS_CRITICAL

Step 1:
Clock A is registered, then it becomes orphan.

Step 2:
Clock B is registered. Before clock B reach the critical clock enable
operation, orphan A will find the newly registered parent B and do
reparent operation, then parent B will be finally disabled in
__clk_set_parent_after() due to CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE flag as there's
still no users of B which will then trigger the following warning.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/clk/clk.c:597 clk_core_disable+0xb4/0xe0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-00056-gdff1f66-dirty raspberrypi#1373
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Backtrace:
[<c010c4bc>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010c764>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
 r6:600000d3 r5:00000000 r4:c0e26358 r3:00000000
[<c010c74c>] (show_stack) from [<c040599c>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe8)
[<c04058e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125c94>] (__warn+0xd8/0x104)
 r10:c0c21cd0 r9:c048aa78 r8:00000255 r7:00000009 r6:c0c1cd90 r5:00000000
 r4:00000000 r3:c0e01d34
[<c0125bbc>] (__warn) from [<c0125d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x30)
 r9:00000000 r8:ef00bf80 r7:c165ac4c r6:ef00bf80 r5:ef00bf80 r4:ef00bf80
[<c0125d4c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048aa78>] (clk_core_disable+0xb4/0xe0)
[<c048a9c4>] (clk_core_disable) from [<c048be88>] (clk_core_disable_lock+0x20/0x2c)
 r4:000000d3 r3:c0e0af00
[<c048be68>] (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048c224>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x14/0x28)
 r5:00000000 r4:ef00bf80
[<c048c210>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048c270>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x38/0x54)
 r4:ef00bd80 r3:000010a0
[<c048c238>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048daa8>] (clk_register+0x4d0/0x648)
 r6:ef00d500 r5:ef00bf80 r4:ef00bd80 r3:ef00bfd4
[<c048d5d8>] (clk_register) from [<c048dc30>] (clk_hw_register+0x10/0x1c)
 r9:00000000 r8:00000003 r7:00000000 r6:00000824 r5:00000001 r4:ef00d500
[<c048dc20>] (clk_hw_register) from [<c048e698>] (_register_divider+0xcc/0x120)
[<c048e5cc>] (_register_divider) from [<c048e730>] (clk_register_divider+0x44/0x54)
 r10:00000004 r9:00000003 r8:00000001 r7:00000000 r6:00000003 r5:00000001
 r4:f0810030
[<c048e6ec>] (clk_register_divider) from [<c0d3ff58>] (imx7ulp_clocks_init+0x558/0xe98)
 r7:c0e296f8 r6:c165c808 r5:00000000 r4:c165c808
[<c0d3fa00>] (imx7ulp_clocks_init) from [<c0d24db0>] (of_clk_init+0x118/0x1e0)
 r10:00000001 r9:c0e01f68 r8:00000000 r7:c0e01f60 r6:ef7f8974 r5:ef0035c0
 r4:00000006
[<c0d24c98>] (of_clk_init) from [<c0d04a50>] (time_init+0x2c/0x38)
 r10:efffed40 r9:c0d61a48 r8:c0e78000 r7:c0e07900 r6:ffffffff r5:c0e78000
 r4:00000000
[<c0d04a24>] (time_init) from [<c0d00b8c>] (start_kernel+0x218/0x394)
[<c0d00974>] (start_kernel) from [<6000807c>] (0x6000807c)
 r10:00000000 r9:410fc075 r8:6000406a r7:c0e0c930 r6:c0d61a44 r5:c0e07918
 r4:c0e78294

We know that the clk isn't enabled with any sort of prepare_count
here so we don't need to enable anything to prevent a race. And
we're holding the prepare mutex so set_rate/set_parent can't race
here either. Based on an earlier patch by Dong Aisheng.

Fixes: fc8726a ("clk: core: support clocks which requires parents enable (part 2)")
Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2018
@bebarino @gregkh
clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting during registration
3a99b64 
[ Upstream commit f8f8f1d ]

The orphan clocks reparent operation shouldn't touch the hardware
if clocks are enabled, otherwise it may get a chance to disable a
newly registered critical clock which triggers the warning below.

Assuming we have two clocks: A and B, B is the parent of A.
Clock A has flag: CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE
Clock B has flag: CLK_IS_CRITICAL

Step 1:
Clock A is registered, then it becomes orphan.

Step 2:
Clock B is registered. Before clock B reach the critical clock enable
operation, orphan A will find the newly registered parent B and do
reparent operation, then parent B will be finally disabled in
__clk_set_parent_after() due to CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE flag as there's
still no users of B which will then trigger the following warning.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/clk/clk.c:597 clk_core_disable+0xb4/0xe0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-00056-gdff1f66-dirty #1373
Hardware name: Generic DT based system
Backtrace:
[<c010c4bc>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010c764>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
 r6:600000d3 r5:00000000 r4:c0e26358 r3:00000000
[<c010c74c>] (show_stack) from [<c040599c>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe8)
[<c04058e8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125c94>] (__warn+0xd8/0x104)
 r10:c0c21cd0 r9:c048aa78 r8:00000255 r7:00000009 r6:c0c1cd90 r5:00000000
 r4:00000000 r3:c0e01d34
[<c0125bbc>] (__warn) from [<c0125d74>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x28/0x30)
 r9:00000000 r8:ef00bf80 r7:c165ac4c r6:ef00bf80 r5:ef00bf80 r4:ef00bf80
[<c0125d4c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048aa78>] (clk_core_disable+0xb4/0xe0)
[<c048a9c4>] (clk_core_disable) from [<c048be88>] (clk_core_disable_lock+0x20/0x2c)
 r4:000000d3 r3:c0e0af00
[<c048be68>] (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048c224>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x14/0x28)
 r5:00000000 r4:ef00bf80
[<c048c210>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048c270>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x38/0x54)
 r4:ef00bd80 r3:000010a0
[<c048c238>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048daa8>] (clk_register+0x4d0/0x648)
 r6:ef00d500 r5:ef00bf80 r4:ef00bd80 r3:ef00bfd4
[<c048d5d8>] (clk_register) from [<c048dc30>] (clk_hw_register+0x10/0x1c)
 r9:00000000 r8:00000003 r7:00000000 r6:00000824 r5:00000001 r4:ef00d500
[<c048dc20>] (clk_hw_register) from [<c048e698>] (_register_divider+0xcc/0x120)
[<c048e5cc>] (_register_divider) from [<c048e730>] (clk_register_divider+0x44/0x54)
 r10:00000004 r9:00000003 r8:00000001 r7:00000000 r6:00000003 r5:00000001
 r4:f0810030
[<c048e6ec>] (clk_register_divider) from [<c0d3ff58>] (imx7ulp_clocks_init+0x558/0xe98)
 r7:c0e296f8 r6:c165c808 r5:00000000 r4:c165c808
[<c0d3fa00>] (imx7ulp_clocks_init) from [<c0d24db0>] (of_clk_init+0x118/0x1e0)
 r10:00000001 r9:c0e01f68 r8:00000000 r7:c0e01f60 r6:ef7f8974 r5:ef0035c0
 r4:00000006
[<c0d24c98>] (of_clk_init) from [<c0d04a50>] (time_init+0x2c/0x38)
 r10:efffed40 r9:c0d61a48 r8:c0e78000 r7:c0e07900 r6:ffffffff r5:c0e78000
 r4:00000000
[<c0d04a24>] (time_init) from [<c0d00b8c>] (start_kernel+0x218/0x394)
[<c0d00974>] (start_kernel) from [<6000807c>] (0x6000807c)
 r10:00000000 r9:410fc075 r8:6000406a r7:c0e0c930 r6:c0d61a44 r5:c0e07918
 r4:c0e78294

We know that the clk isn't enabled with any sort of prepare_count
here so we don't need to enable anything to prevent a race. And
we're holding the prepare mutex so set_rate/set_parent can't race
here either. Based on an earlier patch by Dong Aisheng.

Fixes: fc8726a ("clk: core: support clocks which requires parents enable (part 2)")
Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>
Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
@lanmarc77 lanmarc77 mentioned this issue Dec 8, 2020
Closed
@r-schmidt r-schmidt mentioned this issue Dec 17, 2020
Open
@Elldodo Elldodo mentioned this issue Dec 18, 2020
Open
@guillain guillain mentioned this issue Dec 19, 2020
Open
@kanutope kanutope mentioned this issue Dec 23, 2020
Open
@racedowling racedowling mentioned this issue Dec 23, 2020
Open
@danielaregay danielaregay mentioned this issue Dec 28, 2020
Closed
@joerango joerango mentioned this issue Dec 30, 2020
Open
@andrendahl andrendahl mentioned this issue Jan 3, 2021
Open
@hailfinger hailfinger mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2021
Open
@AndreaPro AndreaPro mentioned this issue Jan 5, 2021
Open
@clougg clougg mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2021
Open
@s3b-s s3b-s mentioned this issue Feb 11, 2021
Open
@tony1tf tony1tf mentioned this issue Feb 24, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@DanTup @XECDesign