-
When lazy minting / minting do the "image" and "external_url" addresses need to be whitelisted? when I use the default scafold-eth https://austingriffith.com/ the images are uploading fine, but when I'm using my own domain the image links are broken? any ideas? on ropsten testnet https://ropsten.rarible.com/user/0xc7025B4B2aaDc883Ae24692adDA584C2537eD965?tab=owned more detail default (working example) {"description":"It's actually a bison?","external_url":"https://austingriffith.com/portfolio/paintings/","image":"https://austingriffith.com/images/paintings/buffalo.jpg","name":"Buffalo","attributes":[{"trait_type":"BackgroundColor","value":"green"},{"trait_type":"Eyes","value":"googly"}]} ipfs Qmc9hvaC9EUK7efbCfJc2QESB9NxW84jbPiTvz1p6Lh91d lazy mint (https://api-dev.rarible.com/protocol/v0.1/ethereum/nft/mints) Token ID: 9001442064760773256891599382055441468032875553241484953867414702318288266 Contract: 0xB0EA149212Eb707a1E5FC1D2d3fD318a8d94cf05 fine example not working with my domain {"description":"It's actually a test?","external_url":"https://my-domain/","image":"https://my-domain/test.png","name":"Test","attributes":[]} Qma1LaEpHzntZRUVdpGeVKzzBk7GLfj1rxZHieEsUXdCAy POST POST request : POST respose : {"id":"0xb0ea149212eb707a1e5fc1d2d3fd318a8d94cf05:90014420647607732568915993820554414680328755532414849538674147023182882668569","contract":"0xb0ea149212eb707a1e5fc1d2d3fd318a8d94cf05","tokenId":"90014420647607732568915993820554414680328755532414849538674147023182882668569","creators":[{"account":"0xc7025b4b2aadc883ae24692adda584c2537ed965","value":10000}],"supply":"1","lazySupply":"1","owners":["0xc7025b4b2aadc883ae24692adda584c2537ed965"],"royalties":[],"date":"2021-11-17T09:22:19.820Z","pending":[],"deleted":false,"meta":{"name":"Untitled","attributes":[]}} Token ID: 9001442064760773256891599382055441468032875553241484953867414702318288266 Contract: 0xB0EA149212Eb707a1E5FC1D2d3fD318a8d94cf05 not working |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
ah looks like it was nothing to do with my domain but my assumed use of attributes : [] would behave the same as attributes removed. Which is doesn't. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
ah looks like it was nothing to do with my domain but my assumed use of
attributes : []
would behave the same as attributes removed. Which is doesn't.