-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixing symmetrize_ddf #1686
fixing symmetrize_ddf #1686
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-21.08 #1686 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 59.77% 59.75% -0.02%
================================================
Files 80 80
Lines 3540 3546 +6
================================================
+ Hits 2116 2119 +3
- Misses 1424 1427 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
cc: @rjzamora It would be great if you could confirm that the use of |
result = ddf.shuffle(on=[ | ||
src_name, dst_name], ignore_index=True, npartitions=num_workers) | ||
result = result.map_partitions(lambda x: x.groupby( | ||
by=[src_name, dst_name], as_index=False).min().reset_index(drop=True)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ayushdg - This looks reasonable to me :)
@gpucibot merge |
fix the function symmetrizing the dask dataframe