Pass table name to extension functions #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Does something hold back this PR that I can help with? |
|
Thank you for your contribution @kfranqueiro and sorry for late answer (cc @imreFitos) 🙏 |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2022
# [0.5.0](v0.4.0...v0.5.0) (2022-03-13) ### Features * add support to specify tables in list of columns ([#13](#13)) ([bc6638d](bc6638d)) * new option to read replacements from a file ([#18](#18)) ([a7c6441](a7c6441)) * output can be stdout so you can pipe it to other commands ([#19](#19)) ([11e46ce](11e46ce)) * table name to extension functions ([#8](#8)) ([9f0a8f8](9f0a8f8))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have a use case where multiple tables have a
namefield, but only one of them refers to PII that needs to be scrubbed, while the other tables should remain intact.Currently there's no way to disambiguate which table we're working with. This PR would pass the table name as an additional argument to extension functions so that they can make smarter decisions about how/if to anonymize.
Open to other ideas here; I figured this way wouldn't cause any breaking changes.