Replace dotenv (unmaintained since 2020) with dotenvy (RUSTSEC-2021-0141)
#447
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`dotenv` is unmaintained and has not received an update since 2020. `dotenvy` is the recommended, drop in fork. Sources: 1. https://github.com/dotenv-rs/dotenv 2. https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0141.html
joshuamegnauth54
force-pushed
the
switch-to-dotenvy
branch
from
1c95ab9
to
61e3689
Compare
ramsayleung
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2023
|
Thanks for your contribution. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Replace the dotenv crate with dotenvy.
dotenvyis a maintained fork recommended by RUSTSEC.Motivation and Context
dotenvis unmaintained and has not received an update since 2020.dotenvyis the recommended, drop in fork.Sources:
Dependencies
Type of change
How has this been tested?
I ran the test suite with
--features env-filebefore and after the change. The fork doesn't change the original crate's API beyond replacingdotenvwithdotenvy.Is this change properly documented?
No, but I'll edit the
CHANGELOG.mdand squash the commits now.