Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature specs: Applications.Core/secretStores extended use cases #57

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion .github/config/en-custom.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -686,4 +686,6 @@ roundtrips
reimplement
keyspace
upsert
TTL
TTL
Tsai
willtsai
229 changes: 229 additions & 0 deletions resources/2024-07-secretstore-feature-spec.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
# Extend the use-cases of `Applications.Core/secretStores`

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this design allow for secrets to be passed as parameters into a Radius Bicep resource?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good question - that's currently a missing scenario, I'll be sure to add it!


* **Status**: Pending
* **Author**: Will Tsai (@willtsai)

## Target customers
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
**Developers and operators** who are building and managing microservice applications, are using Radius to deploy applications and wish to effortlessly and securely manage the secrets for use in their environments and applications.

## Existing customer problem

Currently, Radius provides an `Applications.Core/secretStores` resource type that allows developers to store and retrieve secrets in a secure and reliable way. The `secretStores` resource type can be referenced and used by the following Radius resources today:
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- `Applications.Core/gateways` to manage [TLS certificates for HTTPS connections](https://docs.radapp.io/guides/author-apps/networking/tls/)
- `Applications.Core/environments` for authentication into [private Recipe registries](https://docs.radapp.io/guides/recipes/terraform/howto-private-registry/), [custom Terraform Providers](https://docs.radapp.io/guides/recipes/terraform/howto-custom-provider/), and in [Recipe configurations](https://github.com/radius-project/radius/blob/594faf60683351e4be2dee7309ebc369dfac26ad/test/functional-portable/corerp/noncloud/resources/testdata/corerp-resources-terraform-postgres.bicep#L32).

As an operator, I can create a `secretStores` resource to securely manage secrets for use in the Radius Environments I provide for my developers, which is handy to allow for authentication into private Recipe registries and custom Terraform Providers. However, the `secretStores` resource type is not yet supported by the `Applications.Core/containers`, `Applications.Core/extenders`, `Applications.Core/volumes`, `Applications.Datastores/*`, and `Applications.Messaging/*` resource types. Thus, I have to do extra work to inject secrets as environment variables by configuring each custom Recipe in order to propagate secrets to my application developers.

As an application developer, I cannot reference a `secretStores` resource in the `Applications.Core/containers`, `Applications.Core/extenders`, `Applications.Core/volumes`, `Applications.Datastores/*`, and `Applications.Messaging/*` resource types to securely manage secrets for use in my application. Instead, I'm having to store my secrets in plain text within the `properties.secrets` field for each resource. This is a critical gap in the secret management capabilities of Radius that is hindering my ability to securely manage secrets for use in my containers.
rynowak marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Copy link
Contributor

@lakshmimsft lakshmimsft Sep 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting more info (as discussed) on adding more information on customers bringing in their own secrets, secrets stores resource currently supporting only k8s secrets.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

## Desired customer experience outcome
<!-- <Write this as an “I statement” that expresses the new capability from customer perspective … i.e. After this scenario is implemented “I can do, x, y, z, steps in cloud native app developer and seamlessly blah blah blah …. As a result <summarize positive impact on your work / business> -->

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can simplify this into three cases:

  • Secrets are stored and then mounted as environment-variables in a container.
  • Secrets are stored and then mounted as files-on-disk in a container.
  • Secrets are stored and used internally by the Radius infrastructure or some other piece of automation (not application code).

As an operator, I can define an `Applications.Core/secretStores` resource and deploy it along with an Environment so that the developers I support can securely leverage secrets I manage on their behalf for use in their application resources.

As a developer, I can reference an `Applications.Core/secretStores` in my `Applications.Core/containers` resource definition so that Radius will inject secrets as environment variables into my container at deploy time so that credentials can be provided to the container for authentication, etc.

As a developer, I can reference an `Applications.Core/secretStores` in my `Applications.Extenders` or `Applications.Volumes` resource definition so that I no longer have to store secrets as plain text in the `properties.secrets` field of my resource for authentication, etc.
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this document include the design for each of the places we need to update?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the volumes scenario is different. The use-case for extenders belongs in the next paragraph.


As a developer, I can reference an `Applications.Core/secretStores` in my `Applications.Datastores/*` or `Applications.Messaging/*` resource definition so that I no longer have to store secrets as plain text in the `properties.secrets` field of my resource for authentication, etc.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this is for later, but do we want the user-defined providers and types to be able to user secretStores?


### Detailed Customer Experience
<!-- <List of steps the customer goes through from the start to the end of the scenario to provide more detailed view of exactly what the user is able to do given the new capabilities> -->
<!-- Step 1
Step 2
… -->

Step 1: Operator creates and deploys `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources containing the secret data required for authenticating into resources that their developers may use.
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

```bicep
resource authcreds 'Applications.Core/secretStores@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'authcreds'
properties:{
application: application
type: 'credentials' // this can change based on detailed tech design
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
data: {
'username': {
value: username
}
'password': {
value: password
}
'uri': {
value: uri
}
'connectionString': {
value: connectionString
}
}
}
}
```

```bicep
resource azurekeyvaultsecrets 'Applications.Core/secretStores@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'azurekeyvaultsecrets'
properties:{
application: application
type: 'generic' // this can change based on detailed tech design
data: {
'name': {
value: secret1
}
'version': {
value: 1
}
'encoding': {
value: 'base64'
}
'alias': {
value: secretalias
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't tell how it references from azure keyvault, could you please elaborate on that?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kachawla yes, good catch, in this case I missed adding the reference to an external resource name, so I've added resource: 'secret-app-existing-secret' to the example. Hopefully that clears it up.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be helpful to use a more real example instead of a string like secret-app-existing-secret. For example, if a user wanted to reference an azure keyvault, would they need to provide a fully qualified resource id?

}
}
}
```

Step 2: Developer references the `Applications.Core/secretStores` resource in their `Applications.Core/containers` resource definition to inject secrets as environment variables into their container at deploy time.

```bicep
resource demo 'Applications.Core/containers@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'demo'
properties: {
application: application
container: {
image: 'ghcr.io/radius-project/samples/demo:latest'
env:{
// validate accuracy of referencing the values from the secret store
DB_CONNECTION: authcreds.properties.data.connectionString
willtsai marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
}
ports: {
web: {
containerPort: 3000
}
}
}
}
}
```

Step 3: Developer references the `Applications.Core/secretStores` resource in their `Applications.Extenders` or `Applications.Volumes` resource definition to securely manage secrets for use in their application.

```bicep
resource twilio 'Applications.Core/extenders@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'twilio'
properties: {
application: application
environment: environment
recipe: {
name: 'twilio'
}
secrets: {
// validate accuracy of referencing the values from the secret store
password: authcreds.properties.data.password
}
}
}
```

```bicep
resource volume 'Applications.Core/volumes@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'myvolume'
properties: {
application: app.id
kind: 'azure.com.keyvault'
resource: keyvault.id
secrets: {
mysecret: {
// validate accuracy of referencing the values from the secret store
name: azurekeyvaultsecrets.properties.data.name
version: azurekeyvaultsecrets.properties.data.version
alias: azurekeyvaultsecrets.properties.data.alias
encoding: azurekeyvaultsecrets.properties.data.encoding
}
}
}
}
```

Step 4: Developer references the `Applications.Core/secretStores` resource in their `Applications.Datastores/*` or `Applications.Messaging/*` resource definition to securely manage secrets for use in their application.

```bicep
resource db 'Applications.Datastores/mongoDatabases@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'db'
properties: {
environment: environment
application: app.id
resourceProvisioning: 'manual'
host: substring(cosmosAccount.properties.documentEndpoint, 0, lastIndexOf(cosmosAccount.properties.documentEndpoint, ':'))
port: int(split(substring(cosmosAccount.properties.documentEndpoint,lastIndexOf(cosmosAccount.properties.documentEndpoint, ':') + 1), '/')[0])
database: cosmosAccount::database.name
username: ''
resources: [
{ id: cosmosAccount.id }
]
secrets: {
// validate accuracy of referencing the values from the secret store
connectionString: authcreds.properties.data.connectionString
password: authcreds.properties.data.password
}
}
}
```

```bicep
resource rabbitmq 'Applications.Messaging/rabbitmqQueues@2023-10-01-preview' = {
name: 'rabbitmq'
properties: {
environment: environment
application: app.id
resourceProvisioning: 'manual'
queue: 'radius-queue'
host: rmqHost
port: rmqPort
vHost: vHost
username: rmqUsername
secrets: {
// validate accuracy of referencing the values from the secret store
password: authcreds.properties.data.password
}
}
}
```

Step 5: Developer deploys the resources to Radius and the secrets required for authentication are injected into the container, extender, volume, datastore, or messaging resource at deploy time.

## Key investments
<!-- List the features required to enable this scenario. -->

### Feature 1: Add functionality to reference `Applications.Core/secretStores` in `Applications.Core/containers` resources
<!-- One or two sentence summary -->
Add the ability for developers to reference values from their `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources in their `Applications.Core/containers` resource definitions under the `properties.container.env` field so that secrets can be injected as environment variables into their container at deploy time.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did we do this already?


### Feature 2: Add functionality to reference `Applications.Core/secretStores` in `Applications.Core/*` resources
<!-- One or two sentence summary -->
Add the ability for developers to reference values from their `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources in their core resources (namely `Applications.Core/extenders` and `Applications.Core/volumes`) so that secrets can be securely managed for use in their application to authenticate into those resources.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Should extender be bucketed under portable resources (feature 3)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I bucketed it under Core resources because of its Application.Core namespace, do you think it's misnamed in this case?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd bucket these based on the user's goal/task. I think there are three scenarios:

  • Application code needs to read secrets as env-vars.
  • Application code needs to read secrets as files.
  • Radius needs to operate on secrets for infrastructural purposes (unrelated to user-code).

What's good about this framing is that the user has already decided what they need to accomplish. We can talk clearly about needs and wants without getting stuck in implementation.


### Feature 3: Add functionality to reference `Applications.Core/secretStores` in portable resources
<!-- One or two sentence summary -->
Add the ability for developers to reference values from their `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources in their portable resources (namely `Applications.Datastores/*` and `Applications.Messaging/*`) so that secrets can be securely managed for use in their application to authenticate into those resources.

## Key dependencies and risks
<!-- What dependencies must we take in order to enable this scenario? -->
<!-- What other risks are you aware of that need to be mitigated. If you have a mitigation in mind, summarize here. -->
<!-- Dependency Name – summary of dependency. Issues/concerns/risks with this dependency -->
<!-- Risk Name – summary of risk. Mitigation plan if known. If it is not yet known, no problem. -->

**Dependency: ability to reference values from `Applications.Core/secretStores`.** This feature is dependent on the ability to reference values from `Applications.Core/secretStores`, which should be doable given the existing functionality of referencing secret values for TLS Termination in `Applications.Core/gateways`.

**Risk: use of secrets in core and portable resources.** This pattern of referencing and leveraging secrets in core and portable resources might not be a common or desirable pattern for users. We will validate this by opening up this feature spec for discussion with the community.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if I follow this, are there alternatives that we think might be more desirable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, there are no more desirable alternatives that we can think of, but I just added this as a risk so that we can explicitly call it out and source feedback on it


## Key assumptions to test and questions to answer
<!-- If you are making assumptions that, if incorrect, would cause us to significantly alter our approach to this scenario, make them explicit here. Also call out how / when you plan to validate key assumptions. -->
<!-- What big questions must we answer in order to clarify our plan for this scenario. When and how do you plan to answer those questions (prototype feature x, customer research, competitive research, etc) -->

**Assumption: operators can create and deploy `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources.** We assume that operators create and manage secrets on behalf of developers, which are encapsulated in `Applications.Core/secretStores` resources. The developers can subsequently reference these resources in their application resources to securely manage secrets for use in their applications. We will validate this assumption by opening up this feature spec for discussion with the community.

## Current state
<!-- If we already have some ongoing investment in this area, summarize the current state and point to any relevant documents. -->
- Feature request tracking this scenario: https://github.com/radius-project/radius/issues/5520
- Pull request (work in progress) for adding secretstore references into container env variables: https://github.com/radius-project/radius/pull/7744
Loading