You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After a discussion today with @philvarner, I was wondering whether the Browsable conformance class should actually be part of STAC API - Core. STAC API Core is very slim and Browsable is basically just a tiny addition says that it is potentially a static catalog (or similar). So to make a "static catalog" an "API" you'd just implement STAC API Core + Browsable. And it seems important enough to have this in a central place and not "hidden" in an extension because you should probably need to decide whether you want to add it or not in any case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed this is in STAC meeting 8/15/22, and reached consensus that we should add browseable to the core foundational specification, but just as an optional conformance class. @philvarner will update #321 to reflect this.
After a discussion today with @philvarner, I was wondering whether the Browsable conformance class should actually be part of STAC API - Core. STAC API Core is very slim and Browsable is basically just a tiny addition says that it is potentially a static catalog (or similar). So to make a "static catalog" an "API" you'd just implement STAC API Core + Browsable. And it seems important enough to have this in a central place and not "hidden" in an extension because you should probably need to decide whether you want to add it or not in any case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: