Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add typed/racket/stream #1300

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Lazerbeak12345
Copy link
Contributor

@Lazerbeak12345 Lazerbeak12345 commented Jan 28, 2023

This PR is postponed. An RFC needs made first, and changes to core typed/racket need made for this to work. (StreamOf Type) is very much needed.

I am by no means "claiming" this typed/racket/stream project. Streams are needed, and if anyone else gets to it first i'll be very happy.


See #970 and perhaps others.

  • All functions provided.
  • All values provided
  • macros
  • Prefer StreamOf over Stream?
  • Tests for everything
  • Conform to Style Guide.
  • Docs

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

@Lazerbeak12345
Copy link
Contributor Author

Arguably resyntax shouldn't need to run each time I edit the OP

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant