-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update intent to use defaults as fallback when vp has not claimed #510
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add test for this? or refactor out and test new logic?
Yes tests are incoming.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 14:41, Alex Johnson ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
Can we add test for this? or refactor out and test new logic?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#510 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA7QYA5RUTGA5D7UKMXYQLXQ7PZFANCNFSM6AAAAAA2O5YS2Y>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
*Joe Bowman*
CEO, Ingenuity
Founder, Quicksilver Protocol
***@***.***
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #510 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 56.30% 56.46% +0.16%
===========================================
Files 169 169
Lines 13188 13196 +8
===========================================
+ Hits 7425 7451 +26
+ Misses 5173 5157 -16
+ Partials 590 588 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
1. Summary
Ensure given user does not exercise disproportionate power over aggregateIntent with small number of claims.