Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: compute ibc/xxx denom instead of base denom for comparison #486

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

1. Summary

Fixes QCK-508

Compute ibc denom for ics rewards comparison.

2.Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

3. Implementation details

On receiving the MsgTransfer acknowledgement, use the channel, port and denom to generate the trace and consequently, the IBC denom for us when comparing and distributing funds to users.

ajansari95
ajansari95 previously approved these changes Jul 5, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@ajansari95 ajansari95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@ajansari95 ajansari95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ignore ^ test failing

@aljo242 aljo242 requested a review from ajansari95 July 5, 2023 17:11
Copy link
Contributor

@ajansari95 ajansari95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link

@aljo242 aljo242 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ajansari95 ajansari95 merged commit bf94d79 into develop Jul 6, 2023
@ajansari95 ajansari95 deleted the fix-ibc-denom-instead-of-basedenom branch July 6, 2023 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants