Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump math v1.3.0 -> v1.4.0 #1750

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

bump math v1.3.0 -> v1.4.0 #1750

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

@joe-bowman joe-bowman commented Nov 20, 2024

1. Summary

Bump math to v1.4.0 in response to security advisory

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for cosmossdk.io/math to enhance stability and performance.
    • Modified the format of the retraction directive for better clarity while retaining the same content regarding a safety bug.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the go.mod file, specifically focusing on dependency management. The version of the cosmossdk.io/math module has been upgraded from v1.3.0 to v1.4.0. The format of the retract directive has been changed from multi-line to a single-line entry while retaining the same content. Additionally, existing replace directives for various dependencies remain unchanged, with no new dependencies added or removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Updated cosmossdk.io/math version from v1.3.0 to v1.4.0; modified retract directive format from multi-line to single-line; maintained existing replace directives without additions or removals.

Poem

In the meadow where changes hop,
A version's lifted, we won't stop!
With each new line, our code does sing,
A safer path that updates bring.
So let us dance, both code and rabbit,
In harmony, we’ll never stab it! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
go.mod (1)

362-362: Maintain security-related replace directives

The existing replace directives contain important security fixes (e.g., GHSA-h395-qcrw-5vmq for gin-gonic/gin). These should be maintained until upstream vulnerabilities are resolved.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89845bf and d96b6c5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
go.mod (2)

362-362: LGTM! Format change maintains the same functionality

The retract directive has been reformatted from multi-line to single-line while preserving the same functionality and reason for retraction.


7-7: Verify the latest secure version of cosmossdk.io/math

Let's ensure v1.4.0 is the latest stable version and check for any security advisories.

✅ Verification successful

Upgrade to v1.4.0 is correct and addresses the security vulnerability

The upgrade to cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0 is the correct version as it's the first patched version that fixes the HIGH severity security vulnerability (ASA-2024-010) affecting versions <= 1.3.0. The vulnerability is related to mismatched bit-length validation that could lead to panics.

Note: The proxy.golang.org response seems outdated, but the GitHub security advisory confirms v1.4.0 as the patched version.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the latest version and security advisories for cosmossdk.io/math

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "cosmossdk.io/math") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Check the latest version from proxy.golang.org
curl -s https://proxy.golang.org/cosmossdk.io/math/@v/list | tail -n 1

Length of output: 702

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.57%. Comparing base (89845bf) to head (d96b6c5).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1750   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.57%   61.57%           
=======================================
  Files         196      196           
  Lines       17026    17026           
=======================================
  Hits        10483    10483           
  Misses       5696     5696           
  Partials      847      847           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 61.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@joe-bowman joe-bowman merged commit f41e83c into main Nov 21, 2024
18 checks passed
@joe-bowman joe-bowman deleted the v1.7.3 branch November 21, 2024 23:32
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant