fix: stylecheck lint error on chainId in osmosis submodule

[ajansari95]

1. Summary

Fixes # (issue)

• fixes the lint error due to stylecheck linter on chainId variable.

2.Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

3. Implementation details

• updated chainId to chainID

4. How to test/use

• run [email protected] run

5. Checklist

• Does the Readme need to be updated?
• NA

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced error handling in the Hooks method with clearer error messages for JSON unmarshalling and protocol data queries.

• Improvements

  • Updated parameter naming for clarity in the ApplicableDenomForZone method.
  • Clarified error messages in the ValidateClaim method for better user understanding.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
quicksilver	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Oct 7, 2024 8:29am

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the submodule_osmosiscl.go file, specifically modifying the OsmosisClModule and the Keeper struct. Key updates include a cosmetic change to the parameter name in the ApplicableDenomForZone method, enhancements to error handling in the Hooks method, and clarifications in the error messages of the ValidateClaim method. The overall logic structure remains intact, with an emphasis on improving clarity and robustness in error reporting.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
x/participationrewards/keeper/...	- Updated parameter name from chainId to chainID in ApplicableDenomForZone method. - Improved error handling in Hooks method with specific messages. - Iteration over OsmosisCLPool protocol data added in Hooks. - Clarified error messages in ValidateClaim method while maintaining its logic. - KeyPool method remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

• ensure we use the correct zone denom where evaluating pool claims #1721: This PR modifies the ValidateClaim function in the OsmosisModule to include a check for the applicable denomination using the ApplicableDenomForZone method, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the ApplicableDenomForZone method in the Keeper struct.

Suggested labels

x/participationrewards

Suggested reviewers

• faddat

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Changes hop in a bright array.
With clearer names and errors fine,
Our logic flows, a perfect line.
So let us cheer, with joy we sing,
For better code, the springtime brings! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosiscl.go (1)

135-136: Approved: Improved naming convention for chainID parameter.

The change from chainId to chainID in the function signature is a good improvement. It aligns with Go's naming conventions for abbreviations in identifiers.

For consistency, consider updating the variable name in the function's return signature as well:

-func (k *Keeper) ApplicableDenomForZone(ctx sdk.Context, chainID string) (denom string, found bool) {
+func (k *Keeper) ApplicableDenomForZone(ctx sdk.Context, chainID string) (denom string, found bool) {

This change would make the function signature fully consistent with the updated parameter name.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03a2194 and b6b6e4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• x/participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosiscl.go (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.41%. Comparing base (03a2194) to head (b6b6e4e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1724   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.41%   63.41%           
=======================================
  Files         194      194           
  Lines       13436    13436           
=======================================
  Hits         8521     8521           
  Misses       4097     4097           
  Partials      818      818           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	63.41% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...participationrewards/keeper/submodule_osmosiscl.go	41.57% <100.00%> (ø)

[joe-bowman]

lgtm