airdrop: improve code coverage

[pysel]

1. Summary

Fixes #None

2.Type of change

This PR improves code coverage of module airdrop from 49 to 62 percent

[vercel]

@pysel is attempting to deploy a commit to the quicksilver Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The updates primarily focus on enhancing the testing suite for the airdrop functionality in a blockchain project. New test cases have been added to evaluate various aspects of claim records and zone drops, along with a specific test for handling undefined actions in message server tests. The modifications aim to ensure robustness and thorough validation of the airdrop mechanisms.

Changes

File Path	Changes
.../keeper/keeper_test.go	Added imports, multiple new test functions, and modified initialization function.
.../keeper/msg_server_test.go	Added a new test case for handling an undefined action scenario.

🐇✨
In the land of code, where the bits align,
A rabbit hopped through, leaving tests behind.
With each new function, its heart did swell,
"To bugs and errors, we say farewell!"
So cheers to the code, robust and prime,
For every test passed, is a victory sublime!
🌟📜

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.91%. Comparing base (089ad08) to head (9103293).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1535      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.41%   62.91%   +0.50%     
==========================================
  Files         194      194              
  Lines       13632    13632              
==========================================
+ Hits         8508     8577      +69     
+ Misses       4308     4233      -75     
- Partials      816      822       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	62.91% <ø> (+0.50%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes