Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor test to lock behavior of SendTokenIBC #1518

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tuantran1702
Copy link
Contributor

@tuantran1702 tuantran1702 commented Apr 29, 2024

1. Summary

Fixes #1517

2.Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

3. Implementation details

4. How to test/use

5. Checklist

  • Does the Readme need to be updated?

6. Limitations (optional)

7. Future Work (optional)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved the setup logic for channel sequences in interchain staking tests to enhance reliability and prevent regressions.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
quicksilver ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 30, 2024 2:32pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The update in the receipt_test.go file involves modifying the setup for interchain staking channel sequences. This change ensures counterparty channel sequences are set before the transfer channels are created, enhancing the robustness of the system by avoiding potential regressions related to channel sequence conflicts.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../keeper/receipt_test.go Adjusted the setup of channel sequences to set counterparty channel sequence before creating transfer channels.

Possibly related issues

Poem

🐇✨
In the realm of code where sequences intertwine,
A rabbit hops along, making channels align.
With a tweak here and there, in the test bed,
Ensures no regression makes its dreadful spread.
🌟🌿 Happy coding, let the channels flow! 🌿🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@joe-bowman
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been deployed to Vercel.

Latest commit: 6b9ded3
✅ Preview: https://pr-1518.app-dev.quicksilver.zone
🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/quicksilver/quicksilver/64dpqfT4PefN8kHPshHfXLKovBnw

View Workflow Logs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.97%. Comparing base (2139cd6) to head (b70eaa8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1518   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.97%   62.97%           
=======================================
  Files         192      192           
  Lines       13495    13495           
=======================================
  Hits         8499     8499           
  Misses       4181     4181           
  Partials      815      815           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 62.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@joe-bowman joe-bowman merged commit dfdfcee into main Apr 30, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@joe-bowman joe-bowman deleted the tuan/refactor-ibc-test branch April 30, 2024 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ideally we should write a test to lock this behavior in and prevent future regressions.
3 participants