-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use local channel in RTS logic #1498
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe update involves altering how Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
This pull request has been deployed to Vercel.
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1498 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 63.13% 63.13%
=======================================
Files 192 192
Lines 13458 13458
=======================================
Hits 8497 8497
Misses 4151 4151
Partials 810 810
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Ideally we should write a test to lock this behavior in and prevent future regressions. |
1. Summary
Fixes #1497
Change channel and port to use the local end of the connection, not the counterparty when sending for RTS.
Summary by CodeRabbit