Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/interchainstaking/keeper: comment about isNumericString choices #1322

Conversation

odeke-em
Copy link
Contributor

@odeke-em odeke-em commented Mar 22, 2024

Adds a comment for future selves, about the choice of strconv.ParseInt inside isNumericString and showing that its limits won't be exceeded.

Updates PR #1319

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved numeric string validation in interchain staking logic to accommodate a wider range of token supplies.

Adds a comment for future selves, about the choice of strconv.ParseInt
inside isNumericString and showing that its limits won't be exceeded.

Updates PR quicksilver-zone#1319
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 22, 2024

@odeke-em is attempting to deploy a commit to the quicksilver Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves refining the method to check for numeric strings within the ibc_packet_handlers.go file. By transitioning from strconv.Atoi to strconv.ParseInt, the change enhances the capability to handle larger numeric ranges, specifically accommodating the QCK token supply's extensive range. This adjustment underscores a thoughtful consideration for accuracy and efficiency in numeric validation processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go Updated isNumericString to use strconv.ParseInt for broader range support in checking numeric values. Comment added to justify ParseInt usage over Atoi for QCK token supply range considerations.

🐇💬

In the code's woven tapestry, a change does gleam,

A rabbit hopped through numbers, chasing a dream.

"Let's count beyond the stars," it said with a smile,

With ParseInt in its toolbox, it went the extra mile.

🌌🔢 For tokens far and wide, a numeric dance,

In the realm of code, giving all numbers a chance.

🐾🥕 Cheers to the devs, with wisdom so bright,

Hopping towards the future, with every byte.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@odeke-em odeke-em mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60e77b3 and ee9f9da.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1)
  • 1447-1454: The added comment explaining the rationale behind using strconv.ParseInt over strconv.Atoi for numeric string validation is clear and informative. It effectively communicates the decision-making process and considerations regarding the QCK token supply's range, which is a good practice for maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

@joe-bowman joe-bowman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@joe-bowman joe-bowman merged commit 02282ac into quicksilver-zone:main Mar 22, 2024
1 check failed
@odeke-em odeke-em deleted the x-interchainstaking-keeper-comment-about-using-strconv.ParseInt branch March 22, 2024 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants