-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/interchainstaking/keeper: comment about isNumericString choices #1322
x/interchainstaking/keeper: comment about isNumericString choices #1322
Conversation
Adds a comment for future selves, about the choice of strconv.ParseInt inside isNumericString and showing that its limits won't be exceeded. Updates PR quicksilver-zone#1319
@odeke-em is attempting to deploy a commit to the quicksilver Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe update involves refining the method to check for numeric strings within the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
x/interchainstaking/keeper/ibc_packet_handlers.go (1)
- 1447-1454: The added comment explaining the rationale behind using
strconv.ParseInt
overstrconv.Atoi
for numeric string validation is clear and informative. It effectively communicates the decision-making process and considerations regarding the QCK token supply's range, which is a good practice for maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Adds a comment for future selves, about the choice of strconv.ParseInt inside isNumericString and showing that its limits won't be exceeded.
Updates PR #1319
Summary by CodeRabbit