-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Final v1.5.0 upgrade handler #1260
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update introduces enhancements focused on protocol data management and claims metadata initialization in the application's upgrade logic. It also refines the distribution conditions within the participation rewards module and improves test coverage for these new functionalities. Additionally, adjustments have been made to the handling of IBC channel settings and token valuation tests, alongside modifications to data structures for better efficiency and clarity. Changes
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Joe, I targeted this to main, because I'd approved the other PR. Do you mind resolving conflicts? |
The merge-base changed after approval.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- app/upgrades/v1_5.go (3 hunks)
- app/upgrades_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (2 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 8
x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution.go (2)
- 64-64: The adjustment in the condition within the loop to check for both
ChainID
andDenom
is a crucial improvement for ensuring that the logic accurately identifies base pairs. This change enhances the robustness of the token value calculation by ensuring that only relevant pairs are considered.
- Correctness: This change ensures that the logic only considers pairs that match both the
ChainID
andDenom
of the base currency, which is essential for accurate calculations.- Logic: By adding this additional check, the logic becomes more precise in identifying base pairs, which is critical for the correct calculation of token values.
This adjustment is a significant improvement in ensuring the accuracy of base pair identification.
- 203-203: Correcting the log message from "distributeto" to "distribute to users from account" improves the clarity of the log output. This change makes it easier for developers and system administrators to understand the actions being performed by the system.
- Maintainability: Clear and descriptive log messages are crucial for maintaining and debugging the system. This change enhances the readability of the logs.
- Best Practices: Following best practices for clear and descriptive logging helps in the effective monitoring and troubleshooting of the system.
The correction in the log message enhances clarity and aligns with best practices for logging.
app/upgrades/v1_5.go (1)
- 87-88: Using
panic
for error handling within theV010500UpgradeHandler
function when initializing claims metadata may not be the best approach, especially in a production environment. Consider handling the error more gracefully to avoid halting the entire upgrade process if this step fails. Logging the error and proceeding with the rest of the upgrade, if possible, might be a safer approach.Consider replacing
panic(err)
with a more graceful error handling mechanism.Skipped due to learnings
User: joe-bowman
PR: #1099
File: app/upgrades/upgrades.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-01-30T14:36:26.571Z
Learning: Usingpanic
in the context of upgrade handlers is acceptable to ensure the upgrade process is halted in case of critical issues.
User: joe-bowman
PR: #1099
File: app/upgrades/upgrades.go:64-86
Timestamp: 2024-01-30T14:33:25.655Z
Learning: Usingpanic
in the context of upgrade handlers is considered acceptable in the Quicksilver project to ensure the upgrade process halts immediately if an error is encountered.
User: faddat
PR: #1099
File: app/upgrades/upgrades.go:50-114
Timestamp: 2024-02-01T20:18:48.868Z
Learning: Usingpanic
in the context of upgrade handlers is considered acceptable in the Quicksilver project to ensure the upgrade process halts immediately if an error is encountered.
User: joe-bowman
PR: #1099
File: app/upgrades/upgrades.go:108-115
Timestamp: 2024-01-30T14:36:14.773Z
Learning: Usingpanic
in the context of upgrade handlers is an acceptable practice for the project, as it's preferred to halt the upgrade process immediately if an error is encountered.app/upgrades_test.go (5)
- 21-21: The addition of
channeltypes
fromgithub.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v5/modules/core/04-channel/types
is appropriate for the changes made in the test file, specifically for setting channel configurations in theInitV150TestZones
function. This import is necessary for the correct initialization of IBC channels in the test setup.- 277-294: The
InitV150TestZones
function has been modified to include new zones with updated connection IDs and chain IDs. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance claims metadata and protocol data addition. It's crucial to ensure that these new zones and their configurations are accurately represented in the production environment to avoid discrepancies. Additionally, the inclusion ofaddVestingAccount
calls for new accounts indicates an expansion in the test setup to cover more scenarios.- 298-306: Updating the channel settings in the
InitV150TestZones
function to match production is a critical step for ensuring the test environment accurately reflects the production setup. This change is necessary for validating the behavior of the system under the new upgrade and ensuring that the IBC channel configurations are correctly initialized. It's important to verify that these channel IDs and counterparty configurations are consistent with the expected production settings.- 657-657: The assertion to check the connection ID of the zone associated with "uqatom" is a good practice to ensure that the zone's configuration matches the expected settings after the upgrade. This check is part of the broader test to validate the upgrade's impact on zone configurations and interchain staking behavior.
- 710-722: The test
CalcTokenValues
withinTestV010500UpgradeHandler
is crucial for verifying the correct calculation of token values post-upgrade. The expected values are defined based on the relative prices between assets as of a specific date. It's important to ensure that these expected values are kept up-to-date with the market conditions to maintain the relevance and accuracy of the test. Additionally, this test highlights the system's ability to handle protocol data and participation rewards calculations, aligning with the PR's objectives.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1260 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 63.29% 63.29%
=======================================
Files 170 170
Lines 11261 11261
=======================================
Hits 7128 7128
Misses 3409 3409
Partials 724 724
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/upgrades/v1_5.go (3 hunks)
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/upgrades/v1_5.go
- x/participationrewards/keeper/distribution_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/upgrades/v1_5.go (3 hunks)
- app/upgrades_test.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/upgrades/v1_5.go
- app/upgrades_test.go
1. Summary
2.Type of change
Summary by CodeRabbit
ChainID
andDenom
.