-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lint #1244
lint #1244
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe modification in question is a straightforward yet essential update within the Changes
o_(")(") TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/claimsmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
x/claimsmanager/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
- 102-102: The change from
+= 1
to++
for incrementing theidx
variable aligns with Go's idiomatic way of handling variable incrementation. This is a good practice for improving code readability and adhering to coding conventions.
1. Summary
Fixes lint error introduced in #1234
Summary by CodeRabbit